Towards clinical grating-interferometry mammography.
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
/ diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Interferometry
/ methods
Mammography
/ methods
Mastectomy
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiation Dosage
Tumor Burden
Interferometry
Mammography
Phase contrast
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
revised:
26
06
2019
pubmed:
24
8
2019
medline:
24
9
2020
entrez:
24
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Grating-interferometry-based mammography (GIM) might facilitate breast cancer detection, as several research works have demonstrated in a pre-clinical setting, since it is able to provide attenuation, differential phase contrast, and scattering images simultaneously. In order to translate this technique to the clinics, it has to be adapted to cover a large field-of-view within a clinically acceptable exposure time and radiation dose. We set up a grating interferometer that fits into a standard mammography system and fulfilled the aforementioned conditions. Here, we present the first mastectomy images acquired with this experimental device. Our system performs at a mean glandular dose of 1.6 mGy for a 5-cm-thick, 18%-dense breast, and a field-of-view of 26 × 21 cm2. It seems to be well-suited as basis for a clinical-environment device. Further, dark-field signals seem to support an improved lesion visualization. Evidently, the effective impact of such indications must be evaluated and quantified within the context of a proper reader study. • Grating-interferometry-based mammography (GIM) might facilitate breast cancer detection, since it is sensitive to refraction and scattering and thus provides additional tissue information. • The most straightforward way to do grating-interferometry in the clinics is to modify a standard mammography device. • In a first approximation, the doses given with this technique seem to be similar to those of conventional mammography.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31440834
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06362-x
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06362-x
pmc: PMC7033145
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1419-1425Subventions
Organisme : FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
ID : 2012-StG 310005-PhaseX
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
ID : CRS112-154472 MedXPhase
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):449-56
pubmed: 25055284
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 21;58(24):8609-20
pubmed: 24254377
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Jan 27;372(2010):20130033
pubmed: 24470415
Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22
pubmed: 18024988
Opt Express. 2017 Mar 20;25(6):6349-6364
pubmed: 28380987
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1959-65
pubmed: 25832086
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):227-36
pubmed: 17229950
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):573-581
pubmed: 28819862
Z Med Phys. 2013 Sep;23(3):228-35
pubmed: 23380071
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):772-80
pubmed: 25350548
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 21;55(14):4169-85
pubmed: 20601778
Med Phys. 2013 Sep;40(9):090701
pubmed: 24007133
Invest Radiol. 2011 Dec;46(12):801-6
pubmed: 21788904
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 12;372(7):593-5
pubmed: 25671249
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3211-3216
pubmed: 28083693
Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):56-65
pubmed: 10659738
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0130776
pubmed: 26110618
Nat Commun. 2014 May 15;5:3797
pubmed: 24827387
Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):131-7
pubmed: 24141742
Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):968-9
pubmed: 23704296
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 22;7:10868
pubmed: 27102968
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86
pubmed: 23117178