National trends in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: utilization and outcomes.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Ischemia
/ epidemiology
Endovascular Procedures
/ trends
Female
Hospital Mortality
/ trends
Hospitalization
/ trends
Humans
Length of Stay
/ trends
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Discharge
/ trends
Patient Readmission
/ trends
Risk Factors
Stroke
/ epidemiology
Thrombolytic Therapy
/ trends
Treatment Outcome
intervention
stroke
thrombectomy
thrombolysis
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
16
04
2019
revised:
23
07
2019
accepted:
29
07
2019
pubmed:
25
8
2019
medline:
19
8
2020
entrez:
25
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Following widespread acceptance of endovascular therapy (ET) for large vessel occlusion stroke in 2015, we assessed nationwide utilization of revascularization for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We utilized the 2013-2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. We identified AIS admissions, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), ET, and vascular risk factors using International Classification of Disease Clinical Modification codes. Main predictor of outcome was the time period of index admission ('pre-endovascular era (pre-EA)' January 2013-January 2015 and 'endovascular era (EA)' February 2015- December 2016). We calculated the proportion of AIS admissions in which, first, VT and second, ET was performed. Among patients treated with ET, we examined the association between era and discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality during index admission, and 30-day readmission. There were 925 363 index AIS admissions before the EA and 857 347 during. A higher proportion of AIS patients received IVT (8.4% vs 7.8%) and ET (2.6% vs 1.3%) in the EA. Although length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the EA (5.70 vs 6.80 days), total charges were greater ($56 691 vs $53 878), and admissions were more often to a metropolitan hospital (65.2% vs 57.2%). Among those treated with ET, a smaller proportion received IVT (29.7% vs 44.9%), LOS was substantively shorter (9.75 vs 12.76 days), and patients had a lower odds of discharge home. The utilization of ET has doubled in the EA but ET remains underutilized. ET is predominantly provided at metropolitan teaching hospitals and associated with higher charges despite shorter LOS and unchanged in-hospital mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31444290
pii: neurintsurg-2019-015019
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015019
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
356-362Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JM reports the following disclosures: Research Support: Stryker, Penumbra, Medtronic, Microvention; Consultant/Ownership Interest: Imperative Care, Cerebrotech, Viseon, Endostream, Rebound Therapeutics, Vastrax; Investor/Stockholder/Owner: BlinkTBI, Serenity, NTI, Neurvana, Cardinal Consulting.