Changes in performance markers and wellbeing in elite senior professional rugby union players during a pre-season period: Analysis of the differences across training phases.
Bench press
Countermovement jump
Periodisation
Self-reports
Training load
Journal
Journal of science and medicine in sport
ISSN: 1878-1861
Titre abrégé: J Sci Med Sport
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9812598
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
29
03
2019
revised:
13
07
2019
accepted:
11
08
2019
pubmed:
27
8
2019
medline:
12
3
2020
entrez:
27
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the magnitude of change and association with variation in training load of two performance markers and wellbeing, over three pre-season training blocks, in elite rugby union athletes. Observational. Twenty-two professional players (age 25±5 years; training age 6±5 years; body mass, 99±13kg; stature 186±6cm) participated in this study, with changes in lower (CMJ height) and upper body (bench press mean speed) neuromuscular function and self-reported wellbeing (WB) assessed during an 11-week period. There was a small increase in CMJ height (0.27, ±0.17 - likely substantial; standardised effect size, ±95% confidence limits - magnitude-based inference) (p=0.003), bench press speed (0.26, ±0.15 - likely substantial) (p=0.001) and WB (0.26, ±0.12 - possibly substantial) (p<0.0001) across the pre-season period. There was a substantial interaction in the effect of training load on these three variables across the three training phases. A two-standard deviation (2SD) change in training load was associated with: a small decrease in CMJ height during the power phase (-0.32, ±0.19 - likely substantial) (p=0.001); a small reduction in bench press speed during the hypertrophy phase (-0.40, ±0.32 - likely substantial) (p=0.02); and a small reduction in WB during the strength phase (-0.40, ±0.24 - very likely substantial) (p<0.0001). The effects of changes in training load across other phases were either likely trivial, only possibly substantial, or unclear. The effect of training load on performance can vary both according to the type of training stimulus being administered and based on whether upper- or lower-body outcomes are being measured.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31447388
pii: S1440-2440(19)30338-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20-26Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.