Predictive capacity of baseline hyperreflective dots on the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) outcomes in diabetic macular edema: a multicenter study.
Aged
Dexamethasone
/ administration & dosage
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ complications
Drug Implants
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glucocorticoids
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Macula Lutea
/ pathology
Macular Edema
/ diagnosis
Male
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Central macular thickness
Dexamethasone
Diabetic macular edema
Hyperreflective dots
Ozurdex
Visual acuity
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
02
04
2019
accepted:
19
08
2019
revised:
16
08
2019
pubmed:
28
8
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
28
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive capacity of the baseline hyperreflective dots (HRDs) on the functional and anatomical response in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Additionally, we assessed the impact of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant on the functional and anatomic outcomes. Retrospective, multicenter study. The number of HRDs was graded in four different stages: [A] none HRDs; [B] few, 1-10 HRDs; [C] moderate, 11-20 HRDs; and [D] many, ≥ 21 HRDs. For statistical purposes, groups A and B were combined [scarce HRDs (S-HRDs)] and group D was renamed as [abundant HRDs (A-HRDs)]. The primary endpoints were the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) according to baseline HRD stage. One hundred eyes from one hundred patients were included in the study. Mean BCVA significantly improved from 52.9 (50.0 to 55.8) letters ETDRS at baseline to 57.2 (54.0 to 60.4) letters at month 6, p = 0.0039. There were no significant differences between the S-HRDs and A-HRD study groups in BCVA. As compared to baseline, CMT reduction was 106.3 (59.8 to 152.7) μm and 94.2 (34.7 to 153.7) μm in S-HRDs and A-HRD groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 each, respectively). Twenty-three (65.7%) and 18 (62.1%) eyes achieved a CMT reduction ≥ 10% in the S-HRD and A-HRD groups, respectively, p = 0.7640. DEX implant significantly reduced the presence of outer nuclear layer (ONL) disruptions (p = 0.0010). The number of HRDs did not influence either functional or anatomic outcomes. DEX implant significantly decreases the number of eyes with ONL disruptions, which might improve retinal integrity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31451909
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04446-4
pii: 10.1007/s00417-019-04446-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drug Implants
0
Glucocorticoids
0
Dexamethasone
7S5I7G3JQL
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2381-2390Subventions
Organisme : Allergan Foundation
ID : NA
Références
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011 Sep;30(5):343-58
pubmed: 21635964
Retina. 2016 Sep;36(9):1630-9
pubmed: 26900741
Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1677-82
pubmed: 13129861
Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(4):347-70
pubmed: 22542913
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 24;53(9):5814-8
pubmed: 22836760
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):789-801
pubmed: 22330964
Curr Diab Rep. 2008 Aug;8(4):263-9
pubmed: 18631437
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):1904-14
pubmed: 24907062
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016 Sep;13(9):1277-87
pubmed: 27293138
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Nov 1;58(13):5958-5967
pubmed: 29183041
Ophthalmologica. 2015;233(3-4):169-75
pubmed: 25924737
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;172:72-79
pubmed: 27644589
Retina. 2019 Jan;39(1):44-51
pubmed: 29697589
Retina. 2016 Dec;36(12):2319-2328
pubmed: 27258668
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2156273
pubmed: 27761468
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;95(5):464-471
pubmed: 27775223
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5965-9
pubmed: 20574019
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 18;11(1):77-82
pubmed: 29375995
Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2114-6
pubmed: 16936162
Retina. 2015 Mar;35(3):449-53
pubmed: 25170862
Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;127(6):688-93
pubmed: 10372879
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Feb 1;59(2):715-721
pubmed: 29392317
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Mar 03;56(3):2012-20
pubmed: 25736792
Retina. 2016 Jul;36(7):1298-308
pubmed: 26689274
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):914-20
pubmed: 19410950
Ophthalmologica. 2015;233(3-4):176-85
pubmed: 25661239
Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4):185-222
pubmed: 28423385
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;96(5):614-8
pubmed: 22133988
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 06;55(3):1370-7
pubmed: 24526445
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14
pubmed: 19896746
Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2473-81
pubmed: 25155371
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):710-7, 717.e1
pubmed: 22137207
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203
pubmed: 25692915