Trends in the Use of Skilled Nursing Facility and Home Health Care Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Facilities and Services Utilization
/ trends
Female
Home Care Services
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Male
Medicare
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Patient Readmission
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Reimbursement, Incentive
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Skilled Nursing Facilities
/ statistics & numerical data
United States
Journal
Medical care
ISSN: 1537-1948
Titre abrégé: Med Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0230027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
8
2019
medline:
31
1
2020
entrez:
28
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals with elevated 30-day readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia. To reduce readmissions, hospitals may have increased referrals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health care. Outcomes included 30-day postdischarge utilization of SNF and home health care, including any use as well as days of use. Subjects included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who were admitted with AMI, HF, or pneumonia to hospitals subject to the HRRP. Using an interrupted time-series analysis, we compared utilization rates observed after the announcement of the HRRP (April 2010 through September 2012) and after the imposition of penalties (October 2012 through September 2014) with projected utilization rates that accounted for pre-HRRP trends (January 2008 through March 2010). Models included patient characteristics and hospital fixed effects. For AMI and HF, utilization of SNF and home health care remained stable overall. For pneumonia, observed utilization of any SNF care increased modestly (1.0%, P<0.001 during anticipation; 2.4%, P<0.001 after penalties) and observed utilization of any home health care services declined modestly (-0.5%, P=0.008 after announcement; -0.7%, P=0.045 after penalties) relative to projections. Beneficiaries with AMI and pneumonia treated at penalized hospitals had higher rates of being in the community 30 days postdischarge. Hospitals might be shifting to more intensive postacute care to avoid readmissions among seniors with pneumonia. At the same time, penalized hospitals' efforts to prevent readmissions may be keeping higher proportions of their patients in the community.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals with elevated 30-day readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia. To reduce readmissions, hospitals may have increased referrals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health care.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Outcomes included 30-day postdischarge utilization of SNF and home health care, including any use as well as days of use. Subjects included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who were admitted with AMI, HF, or pneumonia to hospitals subject to the HRRP. Using an interrupted time-series analysis, we compared utilization rates observed after the announcement of the HRRP (April 2010 through September 2012) and after the imposition of penalties (October 2012 through September 2014) with projected utilization rates that accounted for pre-HRRP trends (January 2008 through March 2010). Models included patient characteristics and hospital fixed effects.
RESULTS
For AMI and HF, utilization of SNF and home health care remained stable overall. For pneumonia, observed utilization of any SNF care increased modestly (1.0%, P<0.001 during anticipation; 2.4%, P<0.001 after penalties) and observed utilization of any home health care services declined modestly (-0.5%, P=0.008 after announcement; -0.7%, P=0.045 after penalties) relative to projections. Beneficiaries with AMI and pneumonia treated at penalized hospitals had higher rates of being in the community 30 days postdischarge.
CONCLUSIONS
Hospitals might be shifting to more intensive postacute care to avoid readmissions among seniors with pneumonia. At the same time, penalized hospitals' efforts to prevent readmissions may be keeping higher proportions of their patients in the community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31453891
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001184
pmc: PMC6742564
mid: NIHMS1535628
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
757-765Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG046838
Pays : United States
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS024284
Pays : United States
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS025394
Pays : United States
Références
West J Nurs Res. 2017 Oct;39(10):1379-1380
pubmed: 28906189
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):559-65
pubmed: 25642907
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug 01;22(8):e287-94
pubmed: 27556831
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):444-50
pubmed: 23861483
Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1219-1226
pubmed: 25539483
Fed Regist. 2018 Aug 08;83(153):39162-290
pubmed: 30091551
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):975-985
pubmed: 28558095
J Hosp Med. 2017 Oct 04;13(4):229-236
pubmed: 29069115
Prof Case Manag. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):37-42
pubmed: 18162970
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):295-6
pubmed: 25437642
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Feb;12(2):216-20
pubmed: 25569845
Am J Med Qual. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):278-85
pubmed: 23118202
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 20;143(12):881-94
pubmed: 16365469
Med Care. 2015 Jun;53(6):492-500
pubmed: 25906015
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):520-8
pubmed: 22007045
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):692-4
pubmed: 24552315
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jun;12(6):904-13
pubmed: 25751120
Can Fam Physician. 2014 May;60(5):e263-71
pubmed: 24829021
Hosp Health Netw. 2013 Jan;87(1):34-6, 45
pubmed: 23413620
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182777
pubmed: 30646181
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):864-72
pubmed: 23650319
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1095-107
pubmed: 24820131
Med J Aust. 2003 Mar 17;178(6):262-6
pubmed: 12633482