Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective.
indicators
interprofessional collaboration
interprofessional primary health care teams
performance measurement
primary health care
Journal
Primary health care research & development
ISSN: 1477-1128
Titre abrégé: Prim Health Care Res Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 08 2019
28 08 2019
Historique:
entrez:
29
8
2019
pubmed:
29
8
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).
Sections du résumé
AIM
The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers.
BACKGROUND
Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models.
METHODS
A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question.
FINDINGS
A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31455458
pii: S1463423619000409
doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000409
pmc: PMC6719251
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e125Références
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729
pubmed: 16279964
Can J Occup Ther. 2011 Jun;78(3):147-55
pubmed: 21699008
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):803-7
pubmed: 26893512
Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):79-80
pubmed: 19287000
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):336-49
pubmed: 20540613
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Sep 05;10:38
pubmed: 21892956
Hosp Q. 2003;7(1):73-82
pubmed: 14674182
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):132-141
pubmed: 28973173
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(4):303-12
pubmed: 23113915
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD000072
pubmed: 28639262
J Interprof Care. 2011 May;25(3):167-74
pubmed: 21182439
Med J Aust. 2013 Sep 2;199(5 Suppl):S22-5
pubmed: 25370088
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jul 10;10:51
pubmed: 19589176
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Dec;37(4):716-27
pubmed: 25525194
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1457-1463
pubmed: 29620672
Healthc Policy. 2014;10(1):86-96
pubmed: 25410698
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jun 03;12:44
pubmed: 21639883
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 16;14:60
pubmed: 23679667
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):256-88
pubmed: 21676023
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):308-13
pubmed: 18055502
Healthc Policy. 2016 Nov;12(2):33-51
pubmed: 28032823
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1217-30
pubmed: 25862411
Fam Pract. 2014 Oct;31(5):607-21
pubmed: 24850794
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):142
pubmed: 27716161
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Mar 29;12:14
pubmed: 21443806
J Interprof Care. 2014 Sep;28(5):393-9
pubmed: 24702046
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):787-794
pubmed: 27797634
J Interprof Care. 2010 Nov;24(6):666-77
pubmed: 20178420
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Health Soc Work. 2016 May;41(2):101-9
pubmed: 27263200