Modelling of substrate access and substrate binding to cephalosporin acylases.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 08 2019
Historique:
received: 30 05 2019
accepted: 14 08 2019
entrez: 29 8 2019
pubmed: 29 8 2019
medline: 30 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Semisynthetic cephalosporins are widely used antibiotics currently produced by different chemical steps under harsh conditions, which results in a considerable amount of toxic waste. Biocatalytic synthesis by the cephalosporin acylase from Pseudomonas sp. strain N176 is a promising alternative. Despite intensive engineering of the enzyme, the catalytic activity is still too low for a commercially viable process. To identify the bottlenecks which limit the success of protein engineering efforts, a series of MD simulations was performed to study for two acylase variants (WT, M6) the access of the substrate cephalosporin C from the bulk to the active site and the stability of the enzyme-substrate complex. In both variants, cephalosporin C was binding to a non-productive substrate binding site (E86α, S369β, S460β) at the entrance to the binding pocket, preventing substrate access. A second non-productive binding site (G372β, W376β, L457β) was identified within the binding pocket, which competes with the active site for substrate binding. Noteworthy, substrate binding to the protein surface followed a Langmuir model resulting in binding constants K = 7.4 and 9.2 mM for WT and M6, respectively, which were similar to the experimentally determined Michaelis constants K

Identifiants

pubmed: 31455800
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48849-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-48849-z
pmc: PMC6712217
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacterial Proteins 0
Cephalosporins 0
cephalosporin C 3XIY7HJT5L
Penicillin Amidase EC 3.5.1.11

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

12402

Références

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Jan;101(2):621-632
pubmed: 27557716
FEBS J. 2014 May;281(10):2443-55
pubmed: 24684708
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Oct 10;310(1):19-27
pubmed: 14511642
Chembiochem. 2011 Jun 14;12(9):1346-51
pubmed: 21591046
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;97(6):2341-55
pubmed: 23417342
J Mol Biol. 2003 Apr 25;328(2):395-408
pubmed: 12691748
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Apr;1854(4):278-83
pubmed: 25560296
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 28;98(18):10037-41
pubmed: 11517324
Structure. 2000 Oct 15;8(10):1059-68
pubmed: 11080627
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019 Apr;37(6):1534-1544
pubmed: 29667536
Biochem J. 2013 Apr 15;451(2):217-26
pubmed: 23373797
J Phys Chem B. 2009 Oct 1;113(39):13018-25
pubmed: 19728720
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Jan 13;11(1):316-24
pubmed: 26574229
Protein Sci. 2005 Dec;14(12):3064-76
pubmed: 16260759
Proteins. 2006 Jul 1;64(1):147-55
pubmed: 16639745
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 8;12(2):e0171741
pubmed: 28178357
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul 1;32(Web Server issue):W665-7
pubmed: 15215472
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Mar;91(3):033311
pubmed: 25871250
Biochemistry. 2006 May 23;45(20):6341-53
pubmed: 16700545
J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 22;277(12):10256-64
pubmed: 11782466
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W511-7
pubmed: 21609950
Langmuir. 2016 Sep 6;32(35):8960-8
pubmed: 27523916
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Nov 9;18(44):30236-30240
pubmed: 27165501
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 21;6:35716
pubmed: 27767080
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
Chem Biol. 2001 Dec;8(12):1253-64
pubmed: 11755403
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 09;5:13909
pubmed: 26350503
Nature. 1991 Jun 6;351(6326):491-4
pubmed: 2046751
J Am Chem Soc. 1969 Mar 12;91(6):1396-400
pubmed: 5776254
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Jul 19;12(8):2634-41
pubmed: 27327574
Biochemistry. 2003 Apr 15;42(14):4084-93
pubmed: 12680762
Eur J Biochem. 1999 Jun;262(3):713-9
pubmed: 10411632
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5869-74
pubmed: 16581913
Dalton Trans. 2013 Mar 7;42(9):3116-26
pubmed: 23018626
Eur J Biochem. 1995 Jun 1;230(2):773-8
pubmed: 7607251
J Mol Biol. 2008 Mar 28;377(3):935-44
pubmed: 18279889
Methods Enzymol. 2013;523:257-83
pubmed: 23422434
Helv Chim Acta. 1968 Jul 10;51(5):1108-19
pubmed: 5683992
Chem Rev. 2013 Aug 14;113(8):5871-923
pubmed: 23617803
J Cheminform. 2011 Mar 16;3:8
pubmed: 21410983
Protein Sci. 2002 Jan;11(1):92-103
pubmed: 11742126
J Chem Phys. 2007 Jan 7;126(1):014101
pubmed: 17212484
FEBS J. 2016 Nov;283(22):4128-4148
pubmed: 27686671
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019 Jan 2;58(1):173-177
pubmed: 30256501

Auteurs

Valerio Ferrario (V)

Institute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.

Mona Fischer (M)

Institute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.

Yushan Zhu (Y)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Jürgen Pleiss (J)

Institute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany. Juergen.Pleiss@itb.uni-stuttgart.de.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Adenosine Triphosphate Adenosine Diphosphate Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases Binding Sites Mitochondria

Conservation of the cooling agent binding pocket within the TRPM subfamily.

Kate Huffer, Matthew C S Denley, Elisabeth V Oskoui et al.
1.00
TRPM Cation Channels Animals Binding Sites Mice Pyrimidinones
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans

Classifications MeSH