Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 05 05 2019
accepted: 08 08 2019
entrez: 30 8 2019
pubmed: 30 8 2019
medline: 11 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268 . Registered on 19 January 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress.
METHODS METHODS
This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268 . Registered on 19 January 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31464638
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
pmc: PMC6716809
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

539

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 1129648

Références

Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Lancet. 1992 Jul 25;340(8813):194-8
pubmed: 1353134
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Aug;18(2):93-100
pubmed: 16203593
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):409-18
pubmed: 16553652
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):419-23
pubmed: 16553653
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;195(1):7-15
pubmed: 16643829
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;21(4):609-24
pubmed: 17400026
BJOG. 2007 Oct;114(10):1191-3
pubmed: 17877671
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309
pubmed: 18283207
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1173-80
pubmed: 20502287
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Sep;90(9):990-6
pubmed: 21623743
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):187.e1-187.e13
pubmed: 23333546
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):394
pubmed: 23665247
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):544-7
pubmed: 24806702
Int Breastfeed J. 2014 Apr 24;9:5
pubmed: 24834106
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 30;14:330
pubmed: 25073486
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):632-41
pubmed: 26267623
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 03;15:285
pubmed: 26531186
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):16-27
pubmed: 26610052
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2480
pubmed: 26672862
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;(12):CD000116
pubmed: 26690497
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):5-8
pubmed: 26696237
Birth. 2016 Dec;43(4):277-284
pubmed: 27565450
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):277
pubmed: 28851307
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):446
pubmed: 29284453
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):119
pubmed: 29454359
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357
pubmed: 30322585
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732

Auteurs

D Turnbull (D)

School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

A Salter (A)

School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

B Simpson (B)

Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

B W Mol (BW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

E Chandraharan (E)

NHS Foundation Trust, St George's University Hospitals, London, UK.

A McPhee (A)

Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

I Symonds (I)

Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

M Benton (M)

School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

S Kuah (S)

Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

G Matthews (G)

Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

K Howard (K)

School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

C Wilkinson (C)

Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. chris.wilkinson@sa.gov.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH