Limited Pre-Speech Auditory Modulation in Individuals Who Stutter: Data and Hypotheses.


Journal

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
ISSN: 1558-9102
Titre abrégé: J Speech Lang Hear Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9705610

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 08 2019
Historique:
entrez: 30 8 2019
pubmed: 30 8 2019
medline: 20 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose We review and interpret our recent series of studies investigating motor-to-auditory influences during speech movement planning in fluent speakers and speakers who stutter. In those studies, we recorded auditory evoked potentials in response to probe tones presented immediately prior to speaking or at the equivalent time in no-speaking control conditions. As a measure of pre-speech auditory modulation (PSAM), we calculated changes in auditory evoked potential amplitude in the speaking conditions relative to the no-speaking conditions. Whereas adults who do not stutter consistently showed PSAM, this phenomenon was greatly reduced or absent in adults who stutter. The same between-group difference was observed in conditions where participants expected to hear their prerecorded speech played back without actively producing it, suggesting that the speakers who stutter use inefficient forward modeling processes rather than inefficient motor command generation processes. Compared with fluent participants, adults who stutter showed both less PSAM and less auditory-motor adaptation when producing speech while exposed to formant-shifted auditory feedback. Across individual participants, however, PSAM and auditory-motor adaptation did not correlate in the typically fluent group, and they were negatively correlated in the stuttering group. Interestingly, speaking with a consistent 100-ms delay added to the auditory feedback signal-normalized PSAM in speakers who stutter, and there no longer was a between-group difference in this condition. Conclusions Combining our own data with human and animal neurophysiological evidence from other laboratories, we interpret the overall findings as suggesting that (a) speech movement planning modulates auditory processing in a manner that may optimize its tuning characteristics for monitoring feedback during speech production and, (b) in conditions with typical auditory feedback, adults who stutter do not appropriately modulate the auditory system prior to speech onset. Lack of modulation of speakers who stutter may lead to maladaptive feedback-driven movement corrections that manifest themselves as repetitive movements or postural fixations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31465711
doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-18-0358
pmc: PMC6813031
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3071-3084

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC007603
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC014510
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC017444
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-137001
Pays : Canada

Références

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jan 05;13(2):135-45
pubmed: 22218206
Brain Lang. 2013 Sep;126(3):263-78
pubmed: 23872286
J Fluency Disord. 2010 Sep;35(3):246-79
pubmed: 20831971
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Sep 1;2(9):338-47
pubmed: 21227230
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 02;10:443
pubmed: 27642279
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Nov;1(7):635-40
pubmed: 10196573
Exp Brain Res. 1988;72(2):316-34
pubmed: 3224647
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Mar;55:145-155
pubmed: 28577876
Neurology. 1985 May;35(5):691-8
pubmed: 3157885
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Dec;56(6):1774-88
pubmed: 23816664
Neurosci Lett. 1999 Apr 16;265(2):119-22
pubmed: 10327183
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Oct 25;5:82
pubmed: 22046152
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0202634
pubmed: 30303960
Neuroreport. 2006 Sep 18;17(13):1375-9
pubmed: 16932142
J Commun Disord. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):393-402
pubmed: 22766458
Neuroscientist. 2014 Oct;20(5):453-67
pubmed: 24342910
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 18;10:234
pubmed: 27242494
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 29;9(1):2540
pubmed: 29959315
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2):
pubmed: 28256029
Curr Biol. 2001 Sep 18;11(18):R729-32
pubmed: 11566114
Neuroscientist. 2018 Sep 28;:1073858418803594
pubmed: 30264661
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;106(2):667-79
pubmed: 21562187
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Nov;96(6):516-25
pubmed: 7489673
Brain. 2015 Mar;138(Pt 3):694-711
pubmed: 25619509
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Aug;33:174-81
pubmed: 25989242
Psychophysiology. 1987 Jul;24(4):375-425
pubmed: 3615753
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan;9(1):26-7
pubmed: 16311591
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1963-1969
pubmed: 29713756
Brain Lang. 2016 Nov;162:60-71
pubmed: 27584714
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 11;8:911
pubmed: 25426056
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Nov;18(11):2471-82
pubmed: 18281301
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):1968-79
pubmed: 12364522
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 9;33(41):16110-6
pubmed: 24107944
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1102-6
pubmed: 18454135
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(3):465-73
pubmed: 20165838
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;89(4):2194-207
pubmed: 12612021
Curr Biol. 2005 Jun 21;15(12):1125-8
pubmed: 15964278
Brain Lang. 2014 Feb;129:24-9
pubmed: 24486601
Neuroimage. 1999 Oct;10(4):448-59
pubmed: 10493902
Hear Res. 2017 May;348:98-111
pubmed: 28284736
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2653-8
pubmed: 23345447
Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:171-88
pubmed: 12693261
Brain Topogr. 1998 Spring;10(3):183-9
pubmed: 9562539
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;112(10):1850-9
pubmed: 11595143
Phys Life Rev. 2009 Sep;6(3):121-43
pubmed: 20161054
J Dent Res. 2010 Apr;89(4):395-9
pubmed: 20200410
Lancet. 2002 Aug 3;360(9330):380-3
pubmed: 12241779
Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Dec;28(6):688-707
pubmed: 19692132
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):R11-6
pubmed: 10943682
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41830
pubmed: 22911857
Brain. 2008 Jan;131(Pt 1):50-9
pubmed: 17928317
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89-108
pubmed: 20367317
Cortex. 2018 Feb;99:55-68
pubmed: 29169049
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1125-38
pubmed: 12495520
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:326-336
pubmed: 29936308
Nature. 1971 Apr 30;230(5296):598-9
pubmed: 4928671
Brain Lang. 2015 Oct;149:97-105
pubmed: 26197258
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2131-41
pubmed: 25203459
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Oct;11:100-108
pubmed: 30175197
Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(7):952-981
pubmed: 23667281
J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Mar;24(1):25-31
pubmed: 7253624
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 27;12(12):739-51
pubmed: 22033537
Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):180-90
pubmed: 15787855
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1309-16
pubmed: 14625555
Brain Lang. 2015 Nov;150:37-44
pubmed: 26335995
Brain Lang. 2015 Apr;143:59-68
pubmed: 25796060
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Aug;189(3):279-88
pubmed: 18493751

Auteurs

Ludo Max (L)

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.

Ayoub Daliri (A)

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH