Novel analytical methods to interpret large sequencing data from small sample sizes.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alleles
DNA-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ genetics
Endonucleases
/ genetics
Female
Glucuronosyltransferase
/ genetics
Humans
Imatinib Mesylate
/ administration & dosage
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
/ genetics
Nuclear Proteins
/ genetics
Pharmacogenomic Variants
/ genetics
Prognosis
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 22
/ genetics
Sample Size
Transcription Factors
/ genetics
UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A9
Young Adult
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Factorial correspondence analysis
Hierarchical clustering on principal components
Next-generation sequencing
Pharmacogenetics
Rank products
Small sample size
Statistics
Journal
Human genomics
ISSN: 1479-7364
Titre abrégé: Hum Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101202210
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 08 2019
30 08 2019
Historique:
received:
06
04
2019
accepted:
19
08
2019
entrez:
1
9
2019
pubmed:
1
9
2019
medline:
18
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Targeted therapies have greatly improved cancer patient prognosis. For instance, chronic myeloid leukemia is now well treated with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Around 80% of the patients reach complete remission. However, despite its great efficiency, some patients are resistant to the drug. This heterogeneity in the response might be associated with pharmacokinetic parameters, varying between individuals because of genetic variants. To assess this issue, next-generation sequencing of large panels of genes can be performed from patient samples. However, the common problem in pharmacogenetic studies is the availability of samples, often limited. In the end, large sequencing data are obtained from small sample sizes; therefore, classical statistical analyses cannot be applied to identify interesting targets. To overcome this concern, here, we described original and underused statistical methods to analyze large sequencing data from a restricted number of samples. To evaluate the relevance of our method, 48 genes involved in pharmacokinetics were sequenced by next-generation sequencing from 24 chronic myeloid leukemia patients, either sensitive or resistant to imatinib treatment. Using a graphical representation, from 708 identified polymorphisms, a reduced list of 115 candidates was obtained. Then, by analyzing each gene and the distribution of variant alleles, several candidates were highlighted such as UGT1A9, PTPN22, and ERCC5. These genes were already associated with the transport, the metabolism, and even the sensitivity to imatinib in previous studies. These relevant tests are great alternatives to inferential statistics not applicable to next-generation sequencing experiments performed on small sample sizes. These approaches permit to reduce the number of targets and find good candidates for further treatment sensitivity studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Targeted therapies have greatly improved cancer patient prognosis. For instance, chronic myeloid leukemia is now well treated with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Around 80% of the patients reach complete remission. However, despite its great efficiency, some patients are resistant to the drug. This heterogeneity in the response might be associated with pharmacokinetic parameters, varying between individuals because of genetic variants. To assess this issue, next-generation sequencing of large panels of genes can be performed from patient samples. However, the common problem in pharmacogenetic studies is the availability of samples, often limited. In the end, large sequencing data are obtained from small sample sizes; therefore, classical statistical analyses cannot be applied to identify interesting targets. To overcome this concern, here, we described original and underused statistical methods to analyze large sequencing data from a restricted number of samples.
RESULTS
To evaluate the relevance of our method, 48 genes involved in pharmacokinetics were sequenced by next-generation sequencing from 24 chronic myeloid leukemia patients, either sensitive or resistant to imatinib treatment. Using a graphical representation, from 708 identified polymorphisms, a reduced list of 115 candidates was obtained. Then, by analyzing each gene and the distribution of variant alleles, several candidates were highlighted such as UGT1A9, PTPN22, and ERCC5. These genes were already associated with the transport, the metabolism, and even the sensitivity to imatinib in previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS
These relevant tests are great alternatives to inferential statistics not applicable to next-generation sequencing experiments performed on small sample sizes. These approaches permit to reduce the number of targets and find good candidates for further treatment sensitivity studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31470908
doi: 10.1186/s40246-019-0235-1
pii: 10.1186/s40246-019-0235-1
pmc: PMC6717342
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA excision repair protein ERCC-5
0
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
Nuclear Proteins
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Transcription Factors
0
UGT1A9 protein, human
0
Imatinib Mesylate
8A1O1M485B
Glucuronosyltransferase
EC 2.4.1.17
UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A9
EC 2.4.1.17
Endonucleases
EC 3.1.-
PTPN22 protein, human
EC 3.1.3.48
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 22
EC 3.1.3.48
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41Subventions
Organisme : La Fondation ARC
ID : PGA120140200913
Pays : International
Références
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
FEBS Lett. 1969 Mar;2 Suppl 1:S14-S21
pubmed: 11946359
Genome Med. 2010 Nov 30;2(11):85
pubmed: 21122163
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997 Dec;24(12):907-15
pubmed: 9406655
Am J Hematol. 2010 Jul;85(7):482-6
pubmed: 20575039
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Apr;17(4):197-206
pubmed: 26972588
Blood. 2013 Aug 8;122(6):872-84
pubmed: 23803709
Molecules. 2018 Jan 07;23(1):
pubmed: 29316665
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):343-50
pubmed: 26469045
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;71(6):917-20
pubmed: 21235620
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
FEBS Lett. 2010 Nov 5;584(21):4481-4
pubmed: 20951135
Bioinformatics. 2015 Aug 15;31(16):2748-50
pubmed: 25861966
Leuk Res. 2012 Feb;36(2):174-81
pubmed: 21724255
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Apr;12(2):93-5
pubmed: 22158332
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;15(24):7519-7527
pubmed: 20008852
Biomark Res. 2014 Mar 20;2(1):6
pubmed: 24650752
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Apr 05;1(1):
pubmed: 24175062
Pharmacogenomics. 2018 Apr;19(5):475-393
pubmed: 29569526
Haematologica. 2016 May;101(5):541-58
pubmed: 27132280
Genes Dev. 1999 Apr 1;13(7):768-85
pubmed: 10197977
FEBS Lett. 2004 Aug 27;573(1-3):83-92
pubmed: 15327980
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 29;340(17):1330-40
pubmed: 10219069