Role of Sex in Determining Treatment Type for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularization.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty
/ adverse effects
Atherectomy
/ adverse effects
Databases, Factual
Female
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Lower Extremity
/ blood supply
Male
Middle Aged
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnosis
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Stents
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
angioplasty
atherectomy
patency
stent
treatment disparities
women
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2019
03 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
9
2019
pubmed:
3
9
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Limited data exist to describe factors that influence the use of different endovascular treatments for peripheral arterial disease. Therefore, we studied sex differences in the utilization of endovascular treatment modalities and their impact on arterial patency. Methods and Results We analyzed procedures from 2010 to 2016 in the Vascular Quality Initiative for arteries treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone, stenting (with/without PTA), and atherectomy (with/without PTA). We explored sex differences in treatment modality by arterial segment (iliac, femoropopliteal, and tibial) with multivariable logistic regression. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression to study sex differences in arterial reintervention and occlusion. In this cohort, patients (n=58 247, mean age 68 years, 41% women,) had 106 073 arteries treated (median=2 arteries, interquartile range=1-3). Half (50%) of these arteries were treated with stents, 39% with PTA alone, and 11% with atherectomy. After risk adjustment, women were less likely to undergo stenting or atherectomy (versus PTA alone) in the femoropopliteal (stent risk ratio=0.78 [0.74-0.82]; atherectomy risk ratio=0.69 [0.58-0.82]) and tibial arteries (stent risk ratio=0.70 [0.55-0.89]; atherectomy risk ratio=0.87 [0.70-1.07]). In the iliac arteries there was no sex difference in stenting, and atherectomy was rarely used (0.2%). Women underwent reintervention in the femoropopliteal arteries (hazard ratio=1.28 [1.17-1.40]) or developed an occlusion in the iliac (hazard ratio=1.42 [1.12-1.81]) and femoropopliteal arteries (hazard ratio=1.19 [1.06-1.34]) more frequently than men. Conclusions Women were less likely to undergo stenting or atherectomy and had higher rates of occlusion and reintervention, especially in the femoropopliteal arteries. Evidence-based guidelines are needed to guide optimal use of endovascular treatments for men and women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31475624
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013088
pmc: PMC6755836
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e013088Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1196-202
pubmed: 20674247
BMJ. 2012 Aug 14;345:e5208
pubmed: 22893640
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Sep;34(3):440-6
pubmed: 11533595
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Nov;45(8):703-11
pubmed: 21914680
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005749
pubmed: 29326151
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 4;354(18):1879-88
pubmed: 16672699
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Feb;37(2):399-402
pubmed: 12563213
Ann Vasc Dis. 2015;8(4):343-57
pubmed: 26730266
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):44-54
pubmed: 21172580
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):349-57
pubmed: 19008688
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e013088
pubmed: 31475624
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb;19(1):1-9
pubmed: 22313193
Vascular. 2011 Apr;19(2):59-67
pubmed: 21489930
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul;50(1):54-60
pubmed: 19481407
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33 Suppl 1:S1-75
pubmed: 17140820
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2017 Apr;6(2):251-259
pubmed: 28257772
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 7;50(6):473-90
pubmed: 17678729
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):409-418.e3
pubmed: 24080134
Circulation. 2007 Nov 6;116(19):2203-15
pubmed: 17984390
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):94-102
pubmed: 22147886
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1529-37
pubmed: 22542349
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):910-7
pubmed: 19341885
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1599-613
pubmed: 25908731