Integrating genome-wide co-association and gene expression to identify putative regulators and predictors of feed efficiency in pigs.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 13 12 2018
accepted: 19 08 2019
entrez: 4 9 2019
pubmed: 4 9 2019
medline: 29 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Feed efficiency (FE) has a major impact on the economic sustainability of pig production. We used a systems-based approach that integrates single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) co-association and gene-expression data to identify candidate genes, biological pathways, and potential predictors of FE in a Duroc pig population. We applied an association weight matrix (AWM) approach to analyse the results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for nine FE associated and production traits using 31K SNPs by defining residual feed intake (RFI) as the target phenotype. The resulting co-association network was formed by 829 SNPs. Additive effects of this SNP panel explained 61% of the phenotypic variance of RFI, and the resulting phenotype prediction accuracy estimated by cross-validation was 0.65 (vs. 0.20 using pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction and 0.12 using the 31K SNPs). Sixty-eight transcription factor (TF) genes were identified in the co-association network; based on the lossless approach, the putative main regulators were COPS5, GTF2H5, RUNX1, HDAC4, ESR1, USP16, SMARCA2 and GTF2F2. Furthermore, gene expression data of the gluteus medius muscle was explored through differential expression and multivariate analyses. A list of candidate genes showing functional and/or structural associations with FE was elaborated based on results from both AWM and gene expression analyses, and included the aforementioned TF genes and other ones that have key roles in metabolism, e.g. ESRRG, RXRG, PPARGC1A, TCF7L2, LHX4, MAML2, NFATC3, NFKBIZ, TCEA1, CDCA7L, LZTFL1 or CBFB. The most enriched biological pathways in this list were associated with behaviour, immunity, nervous system, and neurotransmitters, including melatonin, glutamate receptor, and gustation pathways. Finally, an expression GWAS allowed identifying 269 SNPs associated with the candidate genes' expression (eSNPs). Addition of these eSNPs to the AWM panel of 829 SNPs did not improve the accuracy of genomic predictions. Candidate genes that have a direct or indirect effect on FE-related traits belong to various biological processes that are mainly related to immunity, behaviour, energy metabolism, and the nervous system. The pituitary gland, hypothalamus and thyroid axis, and estrogen signalling play fundamental roles in the regulation of FE in pigs. The 829 selected SNPs explained 61% of the phenotypic variance of RFI, which constitutes a promising perspective for applying genetic selection on FE relying on molecular-based prediction.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Feed efficiency (FE) has a major impact on the economic sustainability of pig production. We used a systems-based approach that integrates single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) co-association and gene-expression data to identify candidate genes, biological pathways, and potential predictors of FE in a Duroc pig population.
RESULTS RESULTS
We applied an association weight matrix (AWM) approach to analyse the results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for nine FE associated and production traits using 31K SNPs by defining residual feed intake (RFI) as the target phenotype. The resulting co-association network was formed by 829 SNPs. Additive effects of this SNP panel explained 61% of the phenotypic variance of RFI, and the resulting phenotype prediction accuracy estimated by cross-validation was 0.65 (vs. 0.20 using pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction and 0.12 using the 31K SNPs). Sixty-eight transcription factor (TF) genes were identified in the co-association network; based on the lossless approach, the putative main regulators were COPS5, GTF2H5, RUNX1, HDAC4, ESR1, USP16, SMARCA2 and GTF2F2. Furthermore, gene expression data of the gluteus medius muscle was explored through differential expression and multivariate analyses. A list of candidate genes showing functional and/or structural associations with FE was elaborated based on results from both AWM and gene expression analyses, and included the aforementioned TF genes and other ones that have key roles in metabolism, e.g. ESRRG, RXRG, PPARGC1A, TCF7L2, LHX4, MAML2, NFATC3, NFKBIZ, TCEA1, CDCA7L, LZTFL1 or CBFB. The most enriched biological pathways in this list were associated with behaviour, immunity, nervous system, and neurotransmitters, including melatonin, glutamate receptor, and gustation pathways. Finally, an expression GWAS allowed identifying 269 SNPs associated with the candidate genes' expression (eSNPs). Addition of these eSNPs to the AWM panel of 829 SNPs did not improve the accuracy of genomic predictions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Candidate genes that have a direct or indirect effect on FE-related traits belong to various biological processes that are mainly related to immunity, behaviour, energy metabolism, and the nervous system. The pituitary gland, hypothalamus and thyroid axis, and estrogen signalling play fundamental roles in the regulation of FE in pigs. The 829 selected SNPs explained 61% of the phenotypic variance of RFI, which constitutes a promising perspective for applying genetic selection on FE relying on molecular-based prediction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31477014
doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0490-6
pii: 10.1186/s12711-019-0490-6
pmc: PMC6721172
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

48

Références

Physiol Rev. 2002 Oct;82(4):923-44
pubmed: 12270948
Endocrinology. 2003 Dec;144(12):5347-52
pubmed: 12970162
Bioinformatics. 2004 Feb 12;20(3):307-15
pubmed: 14960456
Endocrinology. 2004 Aug;145(8):3679-85
pubmed: 15087432
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Dec 19;7:538
pubmed: 17177995
J Anim Sci. 2007 Aug;85(8):1873-9
pubmed: 17431052
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3182-8
pubmed: 17785600
J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):287-98
pubmed: 17998435
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Mar;93(3):1062-71
pubmed: 18073311
Curr Genomics. 2006;7(8):497-508
pubmed: 18369406
Bioinformatics. 2008 Nov 1;24(21):2491-7
pubmed: 18784117
Physiol Genomics. 2008 Nov 12;35(3):199-209
pubmed: 18812458
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
J Anim Sci. 2009 Mar;87(3):965-76
pubmed: 19098234
Bioinformatics. 2009 Nov 1;25(21):2855-6
pubmed: 19706745
Nutr Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(5):233-40
pubmed: 19761654
Funct Integr Genomics. 2010 Mar;10(1):39-51
pubmed: 19777276
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010 Feb;298(2):R494-507
pubmed: 19939971
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jun 11;11:372
pubmed: 20540717
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13642-7
pubmed: 20643938
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan 7;88(1):76-82
pubmed: 21167468
J Anim Sci. 2011 Oct;89(10):2963-71
pubmed: 21571897
Meat Sci. 2004 Aug;67(4):651-67
pubmed: 22061815
J Anim Sci. 2012 Apr;90(4):1097-108
pubmed: 22100596
Lab Anim Res. 2012 Jun;28(2):71-6
pubmed: 22787479
J Anim Sci. 2013 May;91(5):1974-81
pubmed: 23345555
Endocr Rev. 2013 Jun;34(3):309-38
pubmed: 23460719
J Anim Sci. 2013 May;91(5):2133-40
pubmed: 23478830
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1815
pubmed: 23657357
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:437-47
pubmed: 23756904
Anim Genet. 2013 Aug;44(4):454-7
pubmed: 23777416
Compr Physiol. 2013 Jul;3(3):1337-62
pubmed: 23897689
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Jan;15(1):34-48
pubmed: 24296534
Anal Biochem. 1987 Apr;162(1):156-9
pubmed: 2440339
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 03;15(2):R29
pubmed: 24485249
BMC Genet. 2014 Feb 17;15:27
pubmed: 24533460
Cell Metab. 2014 Jul 1;20(1):41-53
pubmed: 24856932
Front Genet. 2014 Sep 09;5:307
pubmed: 25250046
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Oct 28;46:68
pubmed: 25359100
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Jan 1;308(1):R1-9
pubmed: 25394828
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 May 09;47:43
pubmed: 25956961
J Anim Sci. 2015 May;93(5):2056-63
pubmed: 26020301
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):2745-58
pubmed: 26115262
Cell. 2015 Jul 2;162(1):23-32
pubmed: 26140590
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 07;5:11953
pubmed: 26150313
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015 Aug 06;6(1):33
pubmed: 26251721
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Oct 16;47:82
pubmed: 26475174
J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Aug;133(4):277-82
pubmed: 26578072
Animal. 2016 Aug;10(8):1311-8
pubmed: 26936644
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Apr 23;48:37
pubmed: 27107817
BMC Genomics. 2016 Jun 13;17:449
pubmed: 27296167
BMC Genomics. 2016 Aug 09;17:594
pubmed: 27506765
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 14;7:40005
pubmed: 28195222
BMC Genomics. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):244
pubmed: 28327084
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45291
pubmed: 28345649
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1637-1644
pubmed: 28468904
Br Poult Sci. 2017 Aug;58(4):358-365
pubmed: 28470126
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jul 17;83(15):
pubmed: 28526795
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0173482
pubmed: 28604785
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1789395
pubmed: 28676863
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 01;18(8):null
pubmed: 28763040
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):9061-9075
pubmed: 28843688
Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 15;8:1555
pubmed: 28861066
eNeuro. 2017 Nov 20;4(6):null
pubmed: 29159281
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):558
pubmed: 29323241
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Apr 6;50(1):14
pubmed: 29625549
BMC Genomics. 2018 Apr 11;19(1):249
pubmed: 29642854
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7303
pubmed: 29740082
BMC Genomics. 2018 Nov 1;19(1):791
pubmed: 30384851
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Mar 13;51(1):10
pubmed: 30866799
Endocrinology. 1994 Jan;134(1):432-40
pubmed: 8275956

Auteurs

Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas (Y)

Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture (IRTA), Torre Marimon, 08140, Caldes de Montbui, Spain.

Emilio Mármol-Sánchez (E)

Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSCIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de LA Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.

Maria Ballester (M)

Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture (IRTA), Torre Marimon, 08140, Caldes de Montbui, Spain.

Juan Pablo Sánchez (JP)

Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture (IRTA), Torre Marimon, 08140, Caldes de Montbui, Spain.

Rayner González-Prendes (R)

Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSCIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de LA Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.

Marcel Amills (M)

Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSCIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus de LA Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.

Raquel Quintanilla (R)

Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture (IRTA), Torre Marimon, 08140, Caldes de Montbui, Spain. raquel.quintanilla@irta.cat.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH