Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves breast cancer patient setup accuracy.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brachytherapy
/ standards
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Middle Aged
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Patient Positioning
Prognosis
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy Setup Errors
/ prevention & control
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
/ standards
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
interfraction motion
optical surface scanning
patient positioning
surface guided radiotherapy
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
15
02
2019
revised:
13
06
2019
accepted:
26
07
2019
pubmed:
4
9
2019
medline:
27
2
2020
entrez:
4
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of the study was to investigate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease setup deviations for tangential and locoregional breast cancer patients compared to conventional laser-based setup (LBS). Both tangential (63 patients) and locoregional (76 patients) breast cancer patients were enrolled in this study. For LBS, the patients were positioned by aligning skin markers to the room lasers. For the surface based setup (SBS), an optical surface scanning system was used for daily setup using both single and three camera systems. To compare the two setup methods, the patient position was evaluated using verification imaging (field images or orthogonal images). For both tangential and locoregional treatments, SBS decreased the setup deviation significantly compared to LBS (P < 0.01). For patients receiving tangential treatment, 95% of the treatment sessions were within the clinical tolerance of ≤ 4 mm in any direction (lateral, longitudinal or vertical) using SBS, compared to 84% for LBS. Corresponding values for patients receiving locoregional treatment were 70% and 54% for SBS and LBS, respectively. No significant difference was observed comparing the setup result using a single camera system or a three camera system. Conventional laser-based setup can with advantage be replaced by surface based setup. Daily SGRT improves patient setup without additional imaging dose to breast cancer patients regardless if a single or three camera system was used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31478615
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12700
pmc: PMC6753725
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61-68Subventions
Organisme : C-RAD AB
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jan 15;46(2):373-81
pubmed: 10661344
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Dec;61(3):299-308
pubmed: 11731000
Med Phys. 2005 Jan;32(1):65-75
pubmed: 15719956
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):934-42
pubmed: 16751076
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Oct;7(10):848-58
pubmed: 17012047
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16
pubmed: 22019144
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):706-12
pubmed: 22320780
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Nov;189(11):938-44
pubmed: 24068172
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr-Jun;2(2):97-105
pubmed: 24674085
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jan-Mar;3(1):16-25
pubmed: 24674259
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 03;10:76
pubmed: 25885270
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 08;17(5):200-211
pubmed: 27685103
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):58-61
pubmed: 28901684
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Aug;48(2):185-90
pubmed: 9783890