Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Pre-Existing Mechanical Mitral Valve Prostheses.
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ complications
Echocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Mitral Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
/ complications
Prosthesis Design
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
aortic stenosis
femoral
prior cardiovascular surgery
transapical
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Journal
The Journal of invasive cardiology
ISSN: 1557-2501
Titre abrégé: J Invasive Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8917477
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
9
2019
pubmed:
4
9
2019
medline:
18
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become standard therapy for aortic stenosis patients with intermediate or high operative risk. Treatment of patients with pre-existing mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) is challenging due to possible interference between the TAVI prosthesis and MVR. We present our single-center experience with this special patient cohort. A total of 1960 patients underwent TAVI at our institution between 2009 and March 2018; of these, 16 patients had pre-existing mechanical MVR. Device success and adverse events were analyzed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. Patients were followed for at least 12 months. Mean patient age was 81.5 ± 4.4 years. The patients had a mean logistic EuroScore of 37.1 ± 13.5% and STS score of 7.1 ± 3.2%. Successful valve deployment was achieved in all patients, peri-interventional stroke rate was 0.0%, and permanent pacemaker was implanted in 2 patients (12.5%). Two patients experienced major complications, with blockage of the MVR disc in 1 patient and annulus rupture in 1 patient. Hence, 30-day mortality was 12.5% and 1-year mortality was 25.0%. TAVI in patients with mechanical MVR is challenging and requires careful preparation and choice of TAVI device. Repositionable and retrievable devices seem to be a safer option.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM