Twenty-year follow-up of functional treatment with a bionator appliance:
Bionator
Functional treatment
Long-term follow-up
Journal
The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
9
2019
medline:
15
8
2020
entrez:
5
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate changes in dental arch configuration, relationship, and malocclusion directly after Class II malocclusion treatment with a Balters bionator modified by Ascher as well as 20 years after treatment. Orthodontic dental cast analysis of 18 patients with skeletal Class II treated with a bionator without any additional fixed therapy was performed with a digital caliper at three stages: before (T0), after (T1) and 20 years after (T2) treatment. Arch perimeter and depth, intermolar and intercanine distance, overjet, overbite, sagittal molar and canine relationship, mandibular incisor irregularity (Little's index), and malocclusion (PAR index) were assessed. During treatment (T0-T1), upper arch perimeter significantly increased with a significant decrease in the upper and lower arch perimeter long-term (T1-T2), whereas corresponding arch depths changed only slightly in both periods. Transverse intermolar width increased significantly during treatment, remaining almost constant from T1 to T2. Lower intercanine distance remained fairly unchanged during treatment, but decreased significantly during follow-up. Lower incisor irregularity improved slightly during treatment but increased significantly long-term. After treatment, sagittal molar relationships on both sides were improved, overjet and overbite reduced; these significant changes remained stable long-term. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index was significantly lower after treatment and increased insignificantly during follow-up. 20 years after bionator treatment without additional fixed appliances, the improved sagittal relationship and the reduced overjet and PAR index remained fairly stable. Long-term changes are most likely due to physiological aging processes and are not associated with bionator treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31483143
doi: 10.2319/042419-292.1
pmc: PMC8051231
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
209-215Références
Am J Orthod. 1985 Aug;88(2):146-56
pubmed: 3861100
Eur J Orthod. 1992 Jun;14(3):180-7
pubmed: 1628684
Semin Orthod. 1998 Mar;4(1):33-45
pubmed: 9573873
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):455-9
pubmed: 23137316
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):98-105
pubmed: 27129869
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):599.e1-12; discussion e1-6
pubmed: 16679196
Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):221-30
pubmed: 12828429
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jul;140(1):e17-24
pubmed: 21724067
Angle Orthod. 2002 Dec;72(6):571-5
pubmed: 12518950
Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):206-10
pubmed: 21208070
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):10-7
pubmed: 19852634
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):547-53
pubmed: 24473721
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):15-27
pubmed: 24373651
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):206-213
pubmed: 29016736
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jul;114(1):88-99
pubmed: 9674686
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2371-2378
pubmed: 26832780
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):790-8
pubmed: 25469744
Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63
pubmed: 1059332
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Oct;26(5):515-22
pubmed: 15536840
Am J Orthod. 1972 Jul;62(1):56-66
pubmed: 4503706
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):18-29
pubmed: 19852635