Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of infections due to Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.


Journal

BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 27 05 2019
accepted: 25 08 2019
entrez: 6 9 2019
pubmed: 6 9 2019
medline: 20 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) represent an important global threat. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical course and outcomes of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) compared to patients treated with other agents. A retrospective cohort study of patients with established CRE infections from January 2017 until August 2018 was conducted. All patients who received CAZ-AVI and all cultures with carbapenem-resistant isolates were screened. We compared patients who received CAZ-AVI for CRE infections with patients who received other agents. A total of 38 consecutive patients with CRE infections were identified. Age and baseline comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The median time from admission to isolation of CRE culture was 22.5 days in the CAZ-AVI group and 17 days in the comparative group (P = 0.7). The incidence of CRE bacteremia was similar between the two groups: 7 patients (70%) in the CAZ-AVI group and 15 patients (53.6%) in the comparative group (P = 0.47). The most common type of CRE infections in both groups was hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen in both groups. A carbapenemase gene was detected in 35 (92%) patients; the OXA-48 gene was the predominant gene identified in 28 (74%) isolates. Eight out of ten patients in the CAZ-AVI group and fifteen out of twenty-eight in the comparative group achieved clinical remission (P = 0.14). After thirty days, all-cause mortality was observed in five patients in the CAZ-AVI group and 16 patients in the comparative group, accounting for 50 and 57% respectively. In patients with established OXA-48-type CRE infection, CAZ-AVI is a reasonable alternative to standard therapy. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) represent an important global threat. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical course and outcomes of patients with CRE infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) compared to patients treated with other agents.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective cohort study of patients with established CRE infections from January 2017 until August 2018 was conducted. All patients who received CAZ-AVI and all cultures with carbapenem-resistant isolates were screened. We compared patients who received CAZ-AVI for CRE infections with patients who received other agents.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 38 consecutive patients with CRE infections were identified. Age and baseline comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The median time from admission to isolation of CRE culture was 22.5 days in the CAZ-AVI group and 17 days in the comparative group (P = 0.7). The incidence of CRE bacteremia was similar between the two groups: 7 patients (70%) in the CAZ-AVI group and 15 patients (53.6%) in the comparative group (P = 0.47). The most common type of CRE infections in both groups was hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen in both groups. A carbapenemase gene was detected in 35 (92%) patients; the OXA-48 gene was the predominant gene identified in 28 (74%) isolates. Eight out of ten patients in the CAZ-AVI group and fifteen out of twenty-eight in the comparative group achieved clinical remission (P = 0.14). After thirty days, all-cause mortality was observed in five patients in the CAZ-AVI group and 16 patients in the comparative group, accounting for 50 and 57% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In patients with established OXA-48-type CRE infection, CAZ-AVI is a reasonable alternative to standard therapy. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31484510
doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4409-1
pii: 10.1186/s12879-019-4409-1
pmc: PMC6724371
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Azabicyclo Compounds 0
Drug Combinations 0
avibactam, ceftazidime drug combination 0
Ceftazidime 9M416Z9QNR

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

772

Références

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;29(12):1099-106
pubmed: 18973455
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jan;18(1):54-60
pubmed: 21722257
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;20(7):1170-5
pubmed: 24959688
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jul;70(7):2133-43
pubmed: 25900159
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Feb;16(2):161-8
pubmed: 26603172
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Mar;16(3):288-9
pubmed: 26842777
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 15;63(2):234-41
pubmed: 27098166
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154092
pubmed: 27104910
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 15;63(12):1615-1618
pubmed: 27624958
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017 Mar;15(3):277-297
pubmed: 27915487
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):711-718
pubmed: 27940944
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Jun;49(6):770-773
pubmed: 28389354
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;59:118-123
pubmed: 28392315
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):726-734
pubmed: 28442293
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):
pubmed: 28630181
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):
pubmed: 28652234
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):1319-1328
pubmed: 28950924
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):163-171
pubmed: 29020404
Drugs. 2018 Apr;78(6):675-692
pubmed: 29671219
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 18;68(3):355-364
pubmed: 29893802
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Nov 1;73(11):3170-3175
pubmed: 30099490
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2019 Feb;15(2):133-149
pubmed: 30626244
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;10:80
pubmed: 30761114
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019 May;36(3):182-186
pubmed: 31056277
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Jul - Aug;12(4):465-471
pubmed: 31060974

Auteurs

Basem M Alraddadi (BM)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. balraddadi@kfshrc.edu.sa.
Department of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. balraddadi@kfshrc.edu.sa.

Mohammed Saeedi (M)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed Qutub (M)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Section of Clinical Microbiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Abeer Alshukairi (A)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Ashraf Hassanien (A)

Anti-infectives, Pfizer, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Ghassan Wali (G)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH