Deep Learning Based Noise Reduction for Brain MR Imaging: Tests on Phantoms and Healthy Volunteers.
brain magnetic resonance imaging
deep learning convolutional neural network
image reconstruction
noise reduction
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
ISSN: 1880-2206
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101153368
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2020
03 Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
6
9
2019
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
6
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To test whether our proposed denoising approach with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) can effectively denoise brain MR images. In an initial experimental study, we obtained brain images from five volunteers and added different artificial noise levels. Denoising was applied to the modified images using a denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN), a shrinkage convolutional neural network (SCNN), and dDLR. Using these brain MR images, we compared the structural similarity (SSIM) index and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) between the three denoising methods. Two neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of the three types of images. In the clinical study, we evaluated the denoising effect of dDLR in brain images with different levels of actual noise such as thermal noise. Specifically, we obtained 2D-T In the experimental study, PSNR and SSIM for dDLR were statistically higher than those of DnCNN and SCNN (P < 0.001). The image quality of dDLR was also superior to DnCNN and SCNN. In the clinical study, dDLR-NAQ2 was significantly better than NAQ2 images for SSIM and PSNR in all three sequences (P < 0.05), except for PSNR in FLAIR. For all qualitative items, dDLR-NAQ2 had equivalent or better image quality than NAQ5, and superior quality to that of NAQ2 (P < 0.05), for all criteria except artifact. The inter-observer agreement ranged from substantial to near perfect. dDLR reduces image noise while preserving image quality on brain MR images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31484849
doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0018
pmc: PMC7553817
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
195-206Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Nov;36(11):2062-7
pubmed: 26228878
Epilepsia. 2012 Sep;53 Suppl 4:19-33
pubmed: 22946718
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Aug;44(2):433-44
pubmed: 26777856
Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):873-81
pubmed: 19346512
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017;10134:
pubmed: 28845077
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):658-666
pubmed: 29267145
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1609-1616
pubmed: 30049723
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007 Aug;16(8):2080-95
pubmed: 17688213
Intern Med. 2013;52(8):877-85
pubmed: 23583991
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15415
pubmed: 29133818
Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):205-11
pubmed: 24029643
Tomography. 2016 Dec;2(4):334-340
pubmed: 28066806
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):881
pubmed: 29343821
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):187-194
pubmed: 30351253
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Apr;22(4):725-e47
pubmed: 25598219
Magn Reson Med. 2018 May;79(5):2745-2751
pubmed: 28921631
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Sep;72(9):1004-12
pubmed: 26192316
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2016 Apr;2016:514-517
pubmed: 31709031
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Oct 18;8:243
pubmed: 27803665
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Jul;26(7):3142-3155
pubmed: 28166495
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Sep;36(9):566-574
pubmed: 29982919
Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3246-55
pubmed: 18812443
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2014 Aug;40(5):520-43
pubmed: 24762203