Controversies in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease that begins early in the course of renal insufficiency as an adaptive response to maintain mineral homeostasis. This complex disorder affects the bone, leading to an increase in fracture risk and is associated with increased risks of vascular calcification and mortality. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we examine the different strategies available to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism. Particularly, we focus on the adequate control of serum phosphorus by restricting intake and the use of phosphate binders, correction of hypocalcemia while minimizing calcium burden, and reduction in PTH levels through the use of vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics. RECENT FINDINGS: It was observed that although numerous agents directed at the correction of these abnormalities have demonstrated effectiveness on biochemical markers, there is still a relative scarcity of studies demonstrating treatment effectiveness as measured by hard clinical outcomes. In addition, most agents have side effects that may limit their use, even in patients in which the treatment has demonstrated efficacy in controlling these parameters. There is still controversy as to what therapeutic regimens to choose for a particular patient and what parameter should be used to follow their effects, including outcomes, side effects, pill burden, and costs, among others. In the present article, we analyze controversial aspects of the different therapeutic agents available. Although many tools and regimens are available, no one by itself is enough for an adequate management of the patient. But rather, combined therapy and individualization of approaches are recommended for better results. We suggest that new studies analyzing the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism should be directed not only to controlling parathyroid hormone levels but also to the evaluation of long-term outcomes, based on modification of morbidity, mortality, and end organ impact, while reducing side effects and controlling costs, among others.