Rituximab is an effective treatment in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and demonstrates a steroid-sparing effect.
Journal
The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
accepted:
29
08
2019
pubmed:
6
9
2019
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
6
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven. To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV. This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone. In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven.
OBJECTIVES
To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV.
METHODS
This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg
RESULTS
At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31487383
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18482
pmc: PMC7317434
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunologic Factors
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1111-1119Subventions
Organisme : Genentech
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006263
pubmed: 19160272
Arch Dermatol. 1984 Jul;120(7):941-51
pubmed: 6375579
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Aug;130(8):2041-8
pubmed: 20410913
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Mar 6;5(175):175ra30
pubmed: 23467561
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175(1):142-9
pubmed: 26800395
Dermatol Clin. 1998 Apr;16(2):277-88
pubmed: 9589201
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Oct;69(4):583-8
pubmed: 23850258
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Apr;34(4):645-52
pubmed: 8601655
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 May;64(5):903-8
pubmed: 21353333
Clin Dermatol. 2001 Nov-Dec;19(6):761-7
pubmed: 11705686
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1170-1201
pubmed: 29192996
Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2031-2040
pubmed: 28342637
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar;82(3):575-585.e1
pubmed: 29438767
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Apr-May;13(4-5):477-81
pubmed: 24424192
Br J Dermatol. 2001 Apr;144(4):775-80
pubmed: 11298536