Factors affecting the early failure of implants placed in a dental practice with a specialization in implantology - a retrospective study.
Early failure
Implant
Osseointegration
Practice-based
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 09 2019
05 09 2019
Historique:
received:
28
03
2019
accepted:
26
08
2019
entrez:
7
9
2019
pubmed:
7
9
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate early failure and possible risk factors for failure of dental implants placed under practice-based conditions. To clarify the research question, anonymized data from 106 patients with 186 dental implants were analyzed. The presence of sucessful healing (yes/no) at the time of incorporation of the final prosthesis was assessed. Mixed models were compiled for each target variable to enable estimation of the effects of patient-related and implant-related conditions on the risk of early implant failure. Nine out of 186 implants (4.8%) placed in 106 participants failed before incorporation of the final prosthesis. The use of shorter implants (< 10 mm) and the need for augmentation procedures were associated with a greater risk of early implant failure. For shorter implants, the risk was 5.8 times greater than that for longer implants (p = 0.0230). Use of augmentation procedures increased the risk by a factor of 5.5 (p = 0.0174). Implants placed in the dental practice with a specialization in implantology heal successfully. The use of augmentation procedures and of implants shorter than 10 mm seems to be associated with a greater risk of early implant failure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To evaluate early failure and possible risk factors for failure of dental implants placed under practice-based conditions.
METHODS
To clarify the research question, anonymized data from 106 patients with 186 dental implants were analyzed. The presence of sucessful healing (yes/no) at the time of incorporation of the final prosthesis was assessed. Mixed models were compiled for each target variable to enable estimation of the effects of patient-related and implant-related conditions on the risk of early implant failure.
RESULTS
Nine out of 186 implants (4.8%) placed in 106 participants failed before incorporation of the final prosthesis. The use of shorter implants (< 10 mm) and the need for augmentation procedures were associated with a greater risk of early implant failure. For shorter implants, the risk was 5.8 times greater than that for longer implants (p = 0.0230). Use of augmentation procedures increased the risk by a factor of 5.5 (p = 0.0174).
CONCLUSIONS
Implants placed in the dental practice with a specialization in implantology heal successfully. The use of augmentation procedures and of implants shorter than 10 mm seems to be associated with a greater risk of early implant failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31488110
doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0900-8
pii: 10.1186/s12903-019-0900-8
pmc: PMC6727348
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
208Références
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 21;31:e69
pubmed: 28832716
J Dent Res. 2014 Jul;93(7 Suppl):20S-28S
pubmed: 24947899
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Sep;38(9):856-63
pubmed: 21722154
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):980-988
pubmed: 28884953
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):864-874
pubmed: 28581891
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Winter;3(4):307-14
pubmed: 21180683
Implant Dent. 1999;8(4):355-9
pubmed: 10709480
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:47-65
pubmed: 28944368
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1077-88
pubmed: 27632263
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):404-412
pubmed: 28185409
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2015 Mar;15(1):30-2
pubmed: 25666579
J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):995-1002
pubmed: 27146701
J Periodontol. 2011 Oct;82(10):1390-5
pubmed: 21417587
Implant Dent. 2016 Aug;25(4):532-40
pubmed: 27129002
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43
pubmed: 14971260
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):617-22
pubmed: 12519336
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):414-9
pubmed: 20116716
Implant Dent. 2016 Apr;25(2):272-80
pubmed: 26836129
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):769-76
pubmed: 16274152
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1084-1094
pubmed: 26856388
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;32(2):125-32
pubmed: 15061861
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Aug;122(2):e31-43
pubmed: 27236830
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Aug;24(8):2047-55
pubmed: 23625320
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Feb;16(1):21-31
pubmed: 22376277
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1068-70
pubmed: 25270707
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Feb 17;32(3):649–654
pubmed: 28212455
J Prosthodont. 2012 Aug;21(6):494-513
pubmed: 22681519
Dent Mater. 2018 Jan;34(1):40-57
pubmed: 29029850
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jan;35 Suppl 1:72-9
pubmed: 18181936