Menopausal Estrogen-Alone Therapy and Health Outcomes in Women With and Without Bilateral Oophorectomy: A Randomized Trial.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 09 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 10 9 2019
medline: 17 6 2020
entrez: 10 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whether health outcomes of menopausal estrogen therapy differ between women with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is unknown. To examine estrogen therapy outcomes by BSO status, with additional stratification by 10-year age groups. Subgroup analyses of the randomized Women's Health Initiative Estrogen-Alone Trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00000611). 40 U.S. clinical centers. 9939 women aged 50 to 79 years with prior hysterectomy and known oophorectomy status. Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/d) or placebo for a median of 7.2 years. Incidence of coronary heart disease and invasive breast cancer (the trial's 2 primary end points), all-cause mortality, and a "global index" (these end points plus stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, and hip fracture) during the intervention phase and 18-year cumulative follow-up. The effects of CEE alone did not differ significantly according to BSO status. However, age modified the effect of CEE in women with prior BSO. During the intervention phase, CEE was significantly associated with a net adverse effect (hazard ratio for global index, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.86]) in older women (aged ≥70 years), but the global index was not elevated in younger women (P trend by age = 0.016). During cumulative follow-up, women aged 50 to 59 years with BSO had a treatment-associated reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.68 [CI, 0.48 to 0.96]), whereas older women with BSO had no reduction (P trend by age = 0.034). There was no significant association between CEE and outcomes among women with conserved ovaries, regardless of age. The timing of CEE in relation to BSO varied; several comparisons were made without adjustment for multiple testing. The effects of CEE did not differ by BSO status in the overall cohort, but some findings varied by age. Among women with prior BSO, in those aged 70 years or older, CEE led to adverse effects during the treatment period, whereas women randomly assigned to CEE before age 60 seemed to derive mortality benefit over the long term. The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Wyeth Ayerst donated the study drugs.

Sections du résumé

Background
Whether health outcomes of menopausal estrogen therapy differ between women with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is unknown.
Objective
To examine estrogen therapy outcomes by BSO status, with additional stratification by 10-year age groups.
Design
Subgroup analyses of the randomized Women's Health Initiative Estrogen-Alone Trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00000611).
Setting
40 U.S. clinical centers.
Participants
9939 women aged 50 to 79 years with prior hysterectomy and known oophorectomy status.
Intervention
Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/d) or placebo for a median of 7.2 years.
Measurements
Incidence of coronary heart disease and invasive breast cancer (the trial's 2 primary end points), all-cause mortality, and a "global index" (these end points plus stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, and hip fracture) during the intervention phase and 18-year cumulative follow-up.
Results
The effects of CEE alone did not differ significantly according to BSO status. However, age modified the effect of CEE in women with prior BSO. During the intervention phase, CEE was significantly associated with a net adverse effect (hazard ratio for global index, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.86]) in older women (aged ≥70 years), but the global index was not elevated in younger women (P trend by age = 0.016). During cumulative follow-up, women aged 50 to 59 years with BSO had a treatment-associated reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.68 [CI, 0.48 to 0.96]), whereas older women with BSO had no reduction (P trend by age = 0.034). There was no significant association between CEE and outcomes among women with conserved ovaries, regardless of age.
Limitations
The timing of CEE in relation to BSO varied; several comparisons were made without adjustment for multiple testing.
Conclusion
The effects of CEE did not differ by BSO status in the overall cohort, but some findings varied by age. Among women with prior BSO, in those aged 70 years or older, CEE led to adverse effects during the treatment period, whereas women randomly assigned to CEE before age 60 seemed to derive mortality benefit over the long term.
Primary Funding Source
The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Wyeth Ayerst donated the study drugs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31499528
pii: 2749725
doi: 10.7326/M19-0274
pmc: PMC8120507
mid: NIHMS1692263
doi:

Substances chimiques

Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00000611']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

406-414

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600002C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600018C
Pays : United States
Organisme : WHI NIH HHS
ID : N01 WH032109
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600003C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600004C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600001C
Pays : United States

Investigateurs

Shari Ludlam (S)
Joan McGowan (J)
Leslie Ford (L)
Nancy Geller (N)
Andrea LaCroix (A)
Charles Kooperberg (C)
Rebecca Jackson (R)
Marian Limacher (M)
Robert Wallace (R)
Lewis Kuller (L)
Sally Shumaker (S)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1036-45
pubmed: 18319414
JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1353-68
pubmed: 24084921
Control Clin Trials. 1998 Feb;19(1):61-109
pubmed: 9492970
JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33
pubmed: 12117397
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1701-12
pubmed: 15082697
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;25(2):200-2
pubmed: 26741200
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):876-7
pubmed: 27168235
Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):680-3
pubmed: 21576536
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113(5):1027-1037
pubmed: 19384117
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):927-938
pubmed: 28898378
Eur Heart J. 2011 Mar;32(6):745-50
pubmed: 21186237
Menopause. 2017 Jul;24(7):728-753
pubmed: 28650869
BMJ. 2017 Feb 6;356:j372
pubmed: 28167486
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974 Dec;39(6):1020-4
pubmed: 4430702
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):65-72
pubmed: 24463665
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):269-279
pubmed: 28784419
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Oct;7(10):821-8
pubmed: 17012044
Menopause. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):15-23
pubmed: 19034050
Maturitas. 2004 Nov 15;49(3):241-51
pubmed: 15488353
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 25;171(8):760-8
pubmed: 21518944
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1;184(5):388-99
pubmed: 27555487
Menopause. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):517-23
pubmed: 18188137
Menopause. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):576-81
pubmed: 19169161
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Feb;85(2):645-51
pubmed: 10690870
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):709-716
pubmed: 23635669
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Jul;75(1):45-9
pubmed: 15158046
Menopause. 2014 Jun;21(6):592-601
pubmed: 24253486
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):3847-53
pubmed: 15827095
N Engl J Med. 1987 Apr 30;316(18):1105-10
pubmed: 3574358
Front Oncol. 2016 Apr 14;6:89
pubmed: 27148481
Menopause. 2016 Jun;23(6):587-8
pubmed: 27116463
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Mar 15;118(6):793-8
pubmed: 4815860
Maturitas. 2011 May;69(1):69-73
pubmed: 21396791
JAMA. 2011 Apr 6;305(13):1305-14
pubmed: 21467283

Auteurs

JoAnn E Manson (JE)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.E.M., S.S.B.).

Aaron K Aragaki (AK)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).

Shari S Bassuk (SS)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.E.M., S.S.B.).

Rowan T Chlebowski (RT)

City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California (R.T.C.).

Garnet L Anderson (GL)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).

Jacques E Rossouw (JE)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.E.R.).

Barbara V Howard (BV)

MedStar Health Research Institute, Bonita Springs, Florida, and Georgetown-Howard Universities, Washington, DC (B.V.H.).

Cynthia A Thomson (CA)

Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (C.A.T.).

Marcia L Stefanick (ML)

Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, California (M.L.S.).

Andrew M Kaunitz (AM)

University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida (A.M.K.).

Carolyn J Crandall (CJ)

David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (C.J.C.).

Charles B Eaton (CB)

Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (C.B.E., S.L.).

Victor W Henderson (VW)

Stanford University, Stanford, California (V.W.H.).

Simin Liu (S)

Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (C.B.E., S.L.).

Juhua Luo (J)

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana (J.L.).

Thomas Rohan (T)

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (T.R.).

Aladdin H Shadyab (AH)

University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California (A.H.S.).

Gretchen Wells (G)

University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (G.W.).

Jean Wactawski-Wende (J)

University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, New York (J.W.).

Ross L Prentice (RL)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH