Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population.
Birth outcomes
Fetal anthropometric gender differences
Perinatal and neonatal management
Prenatal growth
Journal
Biology of sex differences
ISSN: 2042-6410
Titre abrégé: Biol Sex Differ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101548963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 09 2019
09 09 2019
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
accepted:
26
08
2019
entrez:
11
9
2019
pubmed:
11
9
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes. First, second, and third trimester fetal ultrasound examinations were conducted between 2002 and 2012. The data was selected using the following criteria: routine examinations in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, Caucasian ethnicity, and confirmation of gestational age by a crown-rump length (CRL) measurement in the first trimester. Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) was used to align the time frames of the longitudinal fetal measurements, corresponding with the methods of the postnatal growth curves of the WHO MGRS Group. A total of 27,680 complete scans were selected from the astraia© ultrasound database representing 12,368 pregnancies. Gender-specific fetal growth curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were derived. The HC and BPD were significantly larger in boys compared to girls from 20 weeks of gestation onwards (p < 0.001) equating to a 3-day difference at 20-24 weeks. Boys were significantly heavier, longer, and had greater head circumference than girls (p < 0.001) at birth. The Apgar score at 1 min (p = 0.01) and arterial cord pH (p < 0.001) were lower in boys. These longitudinal fetal growth curves for the first time allow integration with neonatal and pediatric WHO gender-specific growth curves. Boys exceed head growth halfway of the pregnancy, and immediate birth outcomes are worse in boys than girls. Gender difference in intrauterine growth is sufficiently distinct to have a clinically important effect on fetal weight estimation but also on the second trimester dating. Therefore, these differences might already play a role in early fetal or immediate neonatal management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes.
METHODS
First, second, and third trimester fetal ultrasound examinations were conducted between 2002 and 2012. The data was selected using the following criteria: routine examinations in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, Caucasian ethnicity, and confirmation of gestational age by a crown-rump length (CRL) measurement in the first trimester. Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) was used to align the time frames of the longitudinal fetal measurements, corresponding with the methods of the postnatal growth curves of the WHO MGRS Group.
RESULTS
A total of 27,680 complete scans were selected from the astraia© ultrasound database representing 12,368 pregnancies. Gender-specific fetal growth curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were derived. The HC and BPD were significantly larger in boys compared to girls from 20 weeks of gestation onwards (p < 0.001) equating to a 3-day difference at 20-24 weeks. Boys were significantly heavier, longer, and had greater head circumference than girls (p < 0.001) at birth. The Apgar score at 1 min (p = 0.01) and arterial cord pH (p < 0.001) were lower in boys.
CONCLUSIONS
These longitudinal fetal growth curves for the first time allow integration with neonatal and pediatric WHO gender-specific growth curves. Boys exceed head growth halfway of the pregnancy, and immediate birth outcomes are worse in boys than girls. Gender difference in intrauterine growth is sufficiently distinct to have a clinically important effect on fetal weight estimation but also on the second trimester dating. Therefore, these differences might already play a role in early fetal or immediate neonatal management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31500671
doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
pii: 10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
pmc: PMC6734449
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
48Références
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Feb;101(2):125-31
pubmed: 8305386
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):321-7
pubmed: 18241086
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 May;75(5):568-76
pubmed: 5754625
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Dec;92(12):1353-60
pubmed: 24032741
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan 1;4(1):34-48
pubmed: 12797224
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Jul;76(7):603-9
pubmed: 5793895
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(3):286-97
pubmed: 16553175
BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):556-65
pubmed: 24387345
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):333-7
pubmed: 3881966
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;6(5):307-12
pubmed: 8590199
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Nov 1;3(6):378-84
pubmed: 12797237
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Feb;106(2):136-43
pubmed: 10426679
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Feb;185:19-22
pubmed: 25496846
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Feb;106(2):126-35
pubmed: 10426678
Acta Paediatr. 2009 May;98(5):898-900
pubmed: 19243351
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):2-5
pubmed: 21182105
J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(2):58P-59P
pubmed: 599463
Epidemiology. 2010 Nov;21(6):791-6
pubmed: 20805749
Teratology. 2001 Nov;64(5):237-51
pubmed: 11745830
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 02;14:157
pubmed: 24886101
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;23(1):23-9
pubmed: 14970994
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Jul-Aug;22(4):431-43
pubmed: 19950190
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1605-7
pubmed: 12501071
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;38(5):538-42
pubmed: 21308833
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Feb;101(2):132-5
pubmed: 8305387
Early Hum Dev. 2004 Jan;76(1):47-54
pubmed: 14729162
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):292.e1-9
pubmed: 24858203
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 15;165(10):1216-8
pubmed: 17344203
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jan;166(1):14-7
pubmed: 23068999
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jun;25(6):456-64
pubmed: 15966062
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):388-96
pubmed: 18348183
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jan;32(1):35-43
pubmed: 23269708
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;7(2):205-16
pubmed: 8516193
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869-79
pubmed: 25209488
Stat Med. 2006 Jan 30;25(2):247-65
pubmed: 16143968
Lancet. 1958 Jun 7;1(7032):1188-95
pubmed: 13550965
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987 Jan;76(1):54-9
pubmed: 3565002
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;35(6):650-5
pubmed: 20512816
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1425-39
pubmed: 22882780
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jan;101(1):35-43
pubmed: 8297866