Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh for recurrent disorders of the posterior pelvic organ compartment.
Biological mesh
Functional outcome
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy
Recurrent posterior compartment prolapse
Recurrent rectal prolapse
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
accepted:
06
08
2019
pubmed:
12
9
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
12
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recurrent prolapse of the posterior pelvic organ compartment presents a management challenge, with the best surgical procedure remaining unclear. We present functional outcome and patient satisfaction after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) with biological mesh in patients with recurrence. We analyzed data from 30 patients with recurrent posterior pelvic organ prolapse who underwent VMR with biological mesh from August 2012 to January 2018. Data included patient demographics and intra- and postoperative findings; functional outcome as assessed by Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), Obstructed Defecation Score Longo (ODS), and Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS); and patient satisfaction. CCCS, CCIS, and ODS were significantly improved at 6-12 months postoperatively and at last follow-up. Patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] 6.7 [0 to 10]), subjective symptoms (+ 3.4 [scale - 5 to + 5]), and quality of life improvement (+ 3.0 [scale from - 5 to + 5]) were high at last follow-up. The rates of morbidity and major complications were 13% and 3%, respectively. There were no mesh-related complications or deaths. Difference in type of previous surgery (abdominal or transanal/perineal) had no significant effect on results. VMR with biological mesh is a safe and effective option for patients with recurrent posterior pelvic organ prolapse. It reduces functional symptoms, has a low complication rate, and promotes patient satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31506799
doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03363-6
pii: 10.1007/s00384-019-03363-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1763-1769Références
Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):35-9
pubmed: 11851660
Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1500-5
pubmed: 15499644
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1200-6
pubmed: 15793635
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jun;12(6):526-32
pubmed: 19486104
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;15(1):115-9
pubmed: 22726304
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2012;59(2):21-4
pubmed: 23373354
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):858-68
pubmed: 23461778
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):650-4
pubmed: 23517144
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):158-67
pubmed: 24929765
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Aug;17(8):657-64
pubmed: 25772797
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):742-7; discussion 747-8
pubmed: 26583661
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 7;22(21):4977-87
pubmed: 27275090
Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Apr;33(2):46-51
pubmed: 28503515
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;32(11):1561-1567
pubmed: 28785819
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):449-457
pubmed: 29442156
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97
pubmed: 8416784
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jun;39(6):681-5
pubmed: 8646957