Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Management in England.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 28 04 2019
revised: 03 07 2019
accepted: 26 07 2019
entrez: 14 9 2019
pubmed: 14 9 2019
medline: 22 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We present the first analysis of the management and outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted in England using National Lung Cancer Audit data. Patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC in 2016 were identified. Linked datasets (including Hospital Episode Statistics, the National Radiotherapy Dataset, the Systemic Anti-Cancer Dataset, pathology reports and death certificate data) were used to categorise the treatment received. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained, with survival defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. In total, 6276 cases of stage III NSCLC were analysed: 3827 stage IIIA and 2449 stage IIIB; 1047 (17%) patients were treated with radical radiotherapy with 676 (11%) of these also receiving chemotherapy. Twenty per cent of patients with stage IIIA disease underwent surgery, with half of these also receiving chemotherapy, predominantly delivered in the adjuvant setting. Of note, 2148 (34%) patients received palliative-intent treatment and 2265 (36%) received no active anti-cancer treatment. The 1-year survival was 32.9% (37.4% for stage IIIA), with the highest survival seen for those patients receiving chemotherapy and surgery. We highlight important gaps in the optimal care of patients with stage III NSCLC in England. Multimodality treatment with either surgery or radical radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy was delivered to less than one-fifth of patients, even though these regimens are considered optimal. Timely access to specialist resources and staff, the practice of effective shared decision making and challenging preconceptions have the potential to optimise management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31514942
pii: S0936-6555(19)30331-0
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

688-696

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

J B Adizie (JB)

University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: j.adizie@nhs.net.

A Khakwani (A)

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

P Beckett (P)

Care Quality Improvement Department, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

N Navani (N)

Care Quality Improvement Department, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

D West (D)

Care Quality Improvement Department, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

I Woolhouse (I)

University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

S V Harden (SV)

Care Quality Improvement Department, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH