Cabozantinib
Fluoride PET/CT
Genitourinary malignancy
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
NaF PET/CT
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
16
05
2019
accepted:
09
08
2019
pubmed:
16
9
2019
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
16
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the prognostic value of We prospectively recruited patients with advanced urological malignancies into a phase I trial of cabozantinib plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. NaF PET/CT scans were performed pre- and 8 weeks post-treatment. We measured the total volume of fluoride avid bone (FTV) using a standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 10. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients in terms of SUVmax, FTV, total lesion fluoride (TLF) uptake at baseline and 8 weeks post-treatment, and percent change in FTV and TLF. Of 111 patients who underwent NaF PET/CT, 30 had bone metastases at baseline. Four of the 30 patients survived for the duration of the study period. OS ranged from 0.23 to 34 months (m) (median 6.0 m). The baseline FTV of all 30 patients ranged from 9.6 to 1570 ml (median 439 ml). The FTV 8 weeks post-treatment was 56-6296 ml (median 448 ml) from 19 available patients. Patients with higher TLF at baseline had shorter OS than patients with lower TLF (3.4 vs 14 m; p = 0.022). Patients with higher SUVmax at follow-up had shorter OS than patients with lower SUVmax (5.6 vs 24 m; p = 0.010). However, FTV and TLF 8 weeks post-treatment did not show a significant difference between groups (5.6 vs 17 m; p = 0.49), and the percent changes in FTV (12 vs 14 m; p = 0.49) and TLF (5.6 vs 17 m; p = 0.54) also were not significant. Higher TLF at baseline and higher SUVmax at follow-up NaF PET/CT corresponded with shorter survival in patients with bone metastases from urological malignancies who underwent treatment. NaF PET/CT may be a useful predictor of OS in this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31522271
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04483-5
pii: 10.1007/s00259-019-04483-5
pmc: PMC6885023
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anilides
0
Ipilimumab
0
Pyridines
0
cabozantinib
1C39JW444G
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Sodium Fluoride
8ZYQ1474W7
Fluorides
Q80VPU408O
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
178-184Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA180803
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233331
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA186712
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261200800001E
Pays : United States
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):765-772
pubmed: 29309249
J Nucl Med. 2016 Jun;57(6):886-92
pubmed: 26795292
ESMO Open. 2016 Jul 7;1(4):e000082
pubmed: 27843632
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1783-6
pubmed: 16714674
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 15;19(2):462-8
pubmed: 23169436
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 May;68(5):813-822
pubmed: 30123922
J Nucl Med. 2015 Oct;56(10):1507-12
pubmed: 26135112
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
J Nucl Med. 2018 Nov;59(11):1665-1671
pubmed: 29602821
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1020-30
pubmed: 24590637
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5461-5471
pubmed: 27169994
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Mar;45(3):376-383
pubmed: 29124281
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 1;15(23):7412-20
pubmed: 19934295
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):700-12
pubmed: 24831977
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):821-830
pubmed: 30506455
J Nucl Med. 2015 Aug;56(8):1177-84
pubmed: 26069307
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(9):1421-1428
pubmed: 28360208
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):267-79
pubmed: 25824720
Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):36001-36011
pubmed: 28415595