How old is old for implant therapy in terms of early implant losses?
dental implant
early implant loss
elderly population
osseointegration
Journal
Journal of clinical periodontology
ISSN: 1600-051X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Periodontol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
17
02
2019
revised:
21
07
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
19
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess, retrospectively, whether older age has an impact on implant osseointegration when compared with younger age. All patients ≥65 years old at implant installation, in an university setting over a time-period of 11.5 years, with complete anamnestic data and follow-up until prosthetic restoration were included, and any early implant loss (EIL; i.e. lack of osseointegration prior to or at the time-point of prosthetic restoration) was recorded. Further, one implant, from each of the elderly patients, was attempted matched to one implant in a younger patient (35 to <55 years old at implant installation) from the same clinic based on (a) gender, (b) implant region, (c) smoking status and (d) bone grafting prior to/simultaneously with implant installation. The potential impact of various local and systemic factors on EIL in the entire elderly population, and in the matched elderly and younger patient group was statistically assessed. Four hundred forty-four patients ≥65 years old (range 65.1-91.3; 56.8% female) receiving 1,517 implants were identified; 10 patients had one EIL each (implant/patient level: 0.66/2.25%). Splitting this patient cohort additionally into four age groups [65-69.9 (n = 213), 70-74.9 (n = 111), 75-79.9 (n = 80) and ≥80 (n = 40)], EIL was on the implant level 0.41, 0.83, 0.34 and 2.26%, respectively, (p = .102) and on the patient level 1.41, 2.70, 1.25 and 7.50%, respectively, (p = .104); multilevel analysis showed weak evidence of association of increasing age with higher EIL rate (p = .090). Matching was possible in 347 cases, and 5 (1.44%) and 9 (2.59%) EIL in the elderly and younger patients, respectively, were observed (p = .280). EIL could not be associated with any systemic condition or medication intake. Elderly patients ≥65 years old presented a similarly low EIL rate as younger patients 35 to <55 years old, while patients ≥80 years old may have a slight tendency for a higher EIL rate. Hence, ageing does not seem to compromise osseointegration, and if at all, then only slightly and at a later stage of life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31529723
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13199
pmc: PMC6899847
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1282-1293Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):980-988
pubmed: 28884953
J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):119S-30S
pubmed: 24158336
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:145-151
pubmed: 30306699
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):920-930
pubmed: 27273468
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Mar;44(3):229-236
pubmed: 27917518
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jan;51(1):51-6
pubmed: 8380447
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):404-412
pubmed: 28185409
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Dec;46(12):1282-1293
pubmed: 31529723
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):22-40
pubmed: 28000277
Gerontology. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2):62-71
pubmed: 11867927
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016 Mar 22;7:44
pubmed: 27006071
J Dent Educ. 2017 Oct;81(10):1233-1242
pubmed: 28966189
J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3
pubmed: 12787220
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jul 01;16(4):e514-7
pubmed: 21196891
J Oral Sci. 2006 Mar;48(1):1-7
pubmed: 16617194
Int J Prosthodont. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):250-6
pubmed: 24905266
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Apr;19(2):222-232
pubmed: 27766743
J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):154S-60S
pubmed: 24158342
Periodontol 2000. 2016 Oct;72(1):120-34
pubmed: 27501495
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Feb;43(2):193-203
pubmed: 26725944
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Sep;38(9):856-63
pubmed: 21722154
J Dent Res. 2014 Nov;93(11):1054-61
pubmed: 25186831
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jul;34(7):610-7
pubmed: 17433044
J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S
pubmed: 25503901
J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):995-1002
pubmed: 27146701
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):150-5
pubmed: 26545864
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):613-623
pubmed: 29574852
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(4):190-8
pubmed: 15841579
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):228-240
pubmed: 28000268
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jun 20;32(5):1097–1102
pubmed: 28632255
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9 Suppl 1:S155-62
pubmed: 27314122
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):414-9
pubmed: 20116716
Implant Dent. 2016 Apr;25(2):272-80
pubmed: 26836129
J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Jan;34(1):1-8
pubmed: 8978646
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Mar;37(3):211-9
pubmed: 20070861
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Summer;3(2):101-10
pubmed: 20623035
Gerodontology. 2011 Mar;28(1):62-8
pubmed: 20545777
J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:22-40
pubmed: 28789860
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):164-170
pubmed: 28095520
Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):470-90
pubmed: 9922739
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:22-38
pubmed: 23062125
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:2-21
pubmed: 23062124
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Feb;15(1):37-46
pubmed: 21414134