Comparison of Prescribing Patterns Before and After Implementation of a National Policy to Reduce Inappropriate Alprazolam Prescribing in Australia.
Alprazolam
Analgesics, Opioid
Australia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Policy
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Legal Epidemiology
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 09 2019
04 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
19
9
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
23
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Benzodiazepines have been a common target for policy interventions to curtail inappropriate use, with mixed results. To reduce alprazolam misuse, in February 2017, Australia delisted the 2-mg tablet strength from public subsidy, eliminated refills, and reduced the pack size from 50 tablets to 10 tablets. To describe changes in alprazolam dispensing, prescribing, and poisonings associated with the implementation of a new policy to reduce inappropriate prescription of alprazolam in Australia. This interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study included data from a 10% sample of Australian people who received publicly subsidized dispensing claims and prescribing approvals for alprazolam from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, and all calls to a poison information service involving alprazolam from February 1, 2015, to October 31, 2018. Autoregressive error models were used to quantify changes over time and compare patterns of use before and after the intervention. Data analyses were conducted from November 2018 to May 2019. Implementation of the policy change on February 1, 2017. Monthly trends in alprazolam prescribing approvals and dispensings, quarterly trends in telephone calls involving alprazolam to a poison information service, and patterns of prescribing and dispensing before and after the intervention. From 2015 to 2018, there were 71 481 alprazolam dispensings to 6772 people. After the intervention, overall dispensing decreased by 51.2% (95% CI, 50.5%-51.9%) and prescribing approvals increased by 17.5% (95% CI, 13.0%-22.2%). Overall, the proportion of dispensing of packs of 51 to 100 tablets increased from 5776 of 24 282 dispensings (23.8%) to 4888 of 10 676 dispensings (45.8%) (risk difference [RD], 22.0% [95% CI, 19.4%-24.6%]) and dispensing of packs of more than 100 tablets increased from 1029 of 24 282 dispensings (4.2%) to 1774 of 10 676 dispensings (16.6%) (RD, 12.4% [95% CI, 10.6%-14.2%]). Among people receiving their first alprazolam prescription, initiation with packs of 10 tablets or fewer increased from 16 of 1127 people (1.4%) before the intervention to 139 of 589 people (23.6%) after the intervention (RD, 22.2% [95% CI, 18.7%-25.7%]). Alprazolam treatment initiation with packs of more than 50 tablets also increased from 63 of 1127 people (5.6%) before the intervention to 144 of 589 people (24.4%) after the intervention (RD, 18.9% [95% CI, 15.1%-22.6%]). During 1 year before the intervention, patients received a median (interquartile range [IQR]) total of 250 (50-600) tablets and median (IQR) total combined tablet strength of 188 (50-550) mg. During 1 year after the intervention, people were dispensed less alprazolam, with a median (IQR) total of 200 (50-500) tablets and median (IQR) total combined tablet strength of 120 (30-360) mg. There was little change in poisoning calls involving alprazolam. This study found that after the policy intervention, subsidized alprazolam use decreased, but the increase in prescribing approvals placed additional burden on prescribers. Even after the intervention, most people who were dispensed alprazolam were still receiving treatment contrary to best-practice recommendations. Furthermore, the poison information center data suggested that people were still being dispensed the 2-mg tablet strength, presumably as nonsubsidized (ie, private) prescriptions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31532519
pii: 2751394
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11590
pmc: PMC6751760
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Alprazolam
YU55MQ3IZY
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1911590Références
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1111-1119
pubmed: 30140896
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1223-5
pubmed: 27379377
Med J Aust. 2014 Mar 3;200(4):219-21
pubmed: 24580525
Med J Aust. 2003 Mar 3;178(5):203-6
pubmed: 12603181
Med Care. 2018 May;56(5):384-390
pubmed: 29634631
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):986-94
pubmed: 23847020
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2004;34(2):103-23
pubmed: 15387395
Clin Ther. 2004 Feb;26(2):322-36
pubmed: 15038954
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):726-733
pubmed: 30873707
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;31(5):647-52
pubmed: 21869686
Aust Prescr. 2015 Oct;38(5):152-5
pubmed: 26648651
JAMA. 1990 Feb 9;263(6):831-9
pubmed: 2404151
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):493-501
pubmed: 26143953
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):439-446
pubmed: 29493050
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Mar;27(2):145-51
pubmed: 18264874
Am J Addict. 2012 Nov;21 Suppl 1:S27-34
pubmed: 23786507
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):135-46
pubmed: 15002636
Med J Aust. 2013 Mar 4;198(4):206-9
pubmed: 23451965
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):42-9
pubmed: 22230829
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Jun;31(4):585-90
pubmed: 22141578
Addiction. 2011 Dec;106(12):2086-109
pubmed: 21714826
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;58(1):88-95
pubmed: 15206998
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Jun;34(3):315-9
pubmed: 20618276
BMJ. 2015 Jun 10;350:h2698
pubmed: 26063215
BMJ. 2017 Mar 14;356:j760
pubmed: 28292769
Med J Aust. 2013 Nov 18;199(10):696-9
pubmed: 24237102
J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;27(1):5-16
pubmed: 24436437
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):572-9
pubmed: 16534046
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Feb;37(1):7-21
pubmed: 21332565