Searching for the Sound of a Cochlear Implant: Evaluation of Different Vocoder Parameters by Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.


Journal

Trends in hearing
ISSN: 2331-2165
Titre abrégé: Trends Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635698

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 20 9 2019
pubmed: 20 9 2019
medline: 13 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cochlear implantation in subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) offers a unique opportunity to directly compare the percepts evoked by a cochlear implant (CI) with those evoked acoustically. Here, nine SSD-CI users performed a forced-choice task evaluating the similarity of speech processed by their CI with speech processed by several vocoders presented to their healthy ear. In each trial, subjects heard two intervals: their CI followed by a certain vocoder in Interval 1 and their CI followed by a different vocoder in Interval 2. The vocoders differed either (i) in carrier type-(sinusoidal [SINE], bandfiltered noise [NOISE], and pulse-spreading harmonic complex) or (ii) in frequency mismatch between the analysis and synthesis frequency ranges-(no mismatch, and two frequency-mismatched conditions of 2 and 4 equivalent rectangular bandwidths [ERBs]). Subjects had to state in which of the two intervals the CI and vocoder sounds were more similar. Despite a large intersubject variability, the PSHC vocoder was judged significantly more similar to the CI than SINE or NOISE vocoders. Furthermore, the No-mismatch and 2-ERB mismatch vocoders were judged significantly more similar to the CI than the 4-ERB mismatch vocoder. The mismatch data were also interpreted by comparing spiral ganglion characteristic frequencies with electrode contact positions determined from postoperative computed tomography scans. Only one subject demonstrated a pattern of preference consistent with adaptation to the CI sound processor frequency-to-electrode allocation table and two subjects showed possible partial adaptation. Those subjects with adaptation patterns presented overall small and consistent frequency mismatches across their electrode arrays.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31533581
doi: 10.1177/2331216519866029
pmc: PMC6753516
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2331216519866029

Références

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63
pubmed: 11519582
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Jun;6(2):180-9
pubmed: 15952053
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:67-72
pubmed: 25997790
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Nov;142(5):EL484
pubmed: 29195445
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1939 Jul;25(7):377-83
pubmed: 16577919
Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):248-59
pubmed: 27116049
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):EL429-35
pubmed: 23145706
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1565-74
pubmed: 14514210
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jan;131(1):531-9
pubmed: 22280614
J Med Case Rep. 2011 Aug 02;5:343
pubmed: 21810235
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Aug;33(8):1929-40
pubmed: 21557388
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jul;82(1):106-15
pubmed: 3624633
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):39-47
pubmed: 21068690
Hear Res. 2015 Jan;319:32-47
pubmed: 25449010
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Sep;38(8):e268-e273
pubmed: 28806337
Ear Hear. 2001 Oct;22(5):431-8
pubmed: 11605950
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):220-33
pubmed: 17318276
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):238-49
pubmed: 19194293
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(9):1562-9
pubmed: 11985837
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):2097-103
pubmed: 10530032
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Oct;33(8):1339-46
pubmed: 22935813
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Aug;126(2):792-805
pubmed: 19640044
Int J Audiol. 2008 Jun;47(6):373-4
pubmed: 18569114
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Feb;139(2):986-91
pubmed: 26936577
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;5(3):285-94
pubmed: 15148651
Brain. 2001 Jul;124(Pt 7):1307-16
pubmed: 11408326
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3114-23
pubmed: 21117760
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):536-40
pubmed: 21307775
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(3):163-71
pubmed: 19005250
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Nov;116(5):3130-40
pubmed: 15603158
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):905-917
pubmed: 30335668
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1348-57
pubmed: 23927131
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;271(4):673-9
pubmed: 23536136
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3629-36
pubmed: 10615701
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Feb;55(1):105-24
pubmed: 22199183
Hear Res. 2008 Jul;241(1-2):73-9
pubmed: 18556160
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1251-5
pubmed: 23553411
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Mar;28(3):187-199
pubmed: 28277210
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):110-24
pubmed: 16450213
Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(6):357-72
pubmed: 22907151
Biophys J. 2014 Jul 1;107(1):233-41
pubmed: 24988357
Psychol Bull. 1979 Jul;86(4):777-803
pubmed: 482484
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jul;39(6):707-714
pubmed: 29889780
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739
pubmed: 23152797
Ear Hear. 1999 Aug;20(4):332-44
pubmed: 10466569
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Jun;3(2):185-99
pubmed: 12162368
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):374-386
pubmed: 28002083
Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):e207-13
pubmed: 25860624
Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 13;18:
pubmed: 25315376
Cereb Cortex. 2010 May;20(5):1217-22
pubmed: 19805418
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2019 Feb 4;19:1
pubmed: 30766449
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):273-9
pubmed: 22968427
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;11(4):625-40
pubmed: 20526727
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Apr;15(2):293-304
pubmed: 24477546
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1281
pubmed: 25190401
Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S113-4
pubmed: 9391623
Ear Hear. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):e62-8
pubmed: 25565660
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):160-7
pubmed: 18025998
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52
pubmed: 18834065
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):1065-72
pubmed: 12597199
Neuroscience. 2014 Jan 3;256:43-52
pubmed: 24157931
Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):81-8
pubmed: 20868733
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):2923-36
pubmed: 24116428
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):241-57
pubmed: 17347777
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1889-900
pubmed: 10089611
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:2-7
pubmed: 19390169

Auteurs

Chadlia Karoui (C)

Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Cochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France.

Chris James (C)

Cochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France.
Department of Otology-Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Pascal Barone (P)

Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.

David Bakhos (D)

Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CHRU de Tours, France.
Ear Nose and Throat department, CHUR de Tours, Tours, France.

Mathieu Marx (M)

Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Department of Otology-Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Olivier Macherey (O)

Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA, Marseille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH