Differences between the Canadian military's Regular and Reserve Forces in perceived need for care, mental health services use and perceived sufficiency of care: a cross-sectional survey.
Adolescent
Adult
Afghan Campaign 2001-
Alcoholism
/ therapy
Anxiety Disorders
/ therapy
Attitude to Health
Canada
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depressive Disorder, Major
/ therapy
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Mental Disorders
/ therapy
Mental Health Services
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Military Personnel
/ psychology
Panic Disorder
/ therapy
Patient Satisfaction
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
/ therapy
Young Adult
health services administration & management
mental health
military
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 09 2019
18 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
21
9
2019
pubmed:
21
9
2019
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The primary objective was to explore differences in perceived need for care (PNC), mental health services use (MHSU) and perceived sufficiency of care (PSC) between Canadian Armed Forces Regular Force (RegF) and Reserve Force (ResF) personnel with an objective need for mental health services. Data came from the 2013 Canadian Armed Forces Mental Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey of serving personnel (n=72 629). Analyses were among those with an Afghanistan deployment and an identified mental disorder (population n=6160; sampled n=868). Logistic regression compared PNC, MHSU and PSC between RegF and ResF. Covariate-adjusted marginal prevalence difference estimates were computed. The primary outcomes were PNC, MHSU and PSC. Each had three service categories, including an aggregate 'any' of the three: (1) information about problems, treatments or services; (2) medication and (3) counselling. ResF had an 10.5% (95% CI -16.7% to -4.4%) lower perceived need for medication services but PNC differences were not significant for other service categories. MHSU tended to be lower for ResF; 9.1% (95%CI -15.5% to -2.6%) lower for medication, 5.4% (95% CI -11.5% to 0.7%) lower, with marginal significance, for counselling and 11.3% (95% CI -17.3% to -5.2%) lower for the 'any' service category. Additionally, ResF tended to have a lower fully met need for care; 13.4% (95% CI -22.1% to -4.6%) lower for information, 15.3% (95% CI -22.9% to -7.6%) lower for counselling and 14.6% (95% CI -22.4% to -6.8%) lower for the 'any' service category. Our findings suggest MHSU and PSC differences between Canadian RegF and ResF personnel that are not fully accounted for by PNC differences. Deficits in ResF members' perceptions of the sufficiency of information services and counselling services suggest perceived, or experienced, barriers to care beyond any PNC barriers. Additional research assessing barriers to mental healthcare is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31537560
pii: bmjopen-2018-028849
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028849
pmc: PMC6756430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e028849Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Both DB and DF report that they are employees of the Canadian Department of National Defence and funding for this research came via this federal government department.
Références
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Nov 1;65(11):1347-53
pubmed: 25081739
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;61(6):348-57
pubmed: 27254844
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013 Sep;26(5):539-57
pubmed: 23009368
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):167-80
pubmed: 17266013
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(2):157-165
pubmed: 28206803
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Feb;62(2):135-42
pubmed: 21285091
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):217-23
pubmed: 18219251
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):1814-37
pubmed: 26840993
Mil Med. 2013 Aug;178(8):846-53
pubmed: 23929044
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9
pubmed: 12578436
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10
pubmed: 7738325
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Feb 17;5:null
pubmed: 24624262
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93-121
pubmed: 15297906
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):962-70
pubmed: 24603316
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;61(1 Suppl):64S-76S
pubmed: 27270744
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1671-9
pubmed: 25033143
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;62(6):413-421
pubmed: 28562093
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Oct;21(10):1072-1078
pubmed: 27261055
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):629-40
pubmed: 15939840
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;61(1 Suppl):10S-25S
pubmed: 27270738
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602
pubmed: 15939837
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 12;8(3):e018735
pubmed: 29530906
J R Soc Med. 2010 Apr;103(4):148-56
pubmed: 20382906
Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):10-7
pubmed: 19956080
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;52:52-68
pubmed: 28013081
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;197(2):149-55
pubmed: 20679269
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Nov;32(11):1037-57
pubmed: 18992940
Ment Health Serv Res. 2004 Mar;6(1):33-46
pubmed: 15002679
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;95:121-128
pubmed: 28843074
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 1;351(1):13-22
pubmed: 15229303
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Mar;59(3):283-9
pubmed: 18308909
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Aug;60(8):1118-22
pubmed: 19648201
Psychol Med. 2000 May;30(3):645-56
pubmed: 10883719
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Dec;32(8):741-53
pubmed: 23063627
J Trauma Stress. 2016 Apr;29(2):124-31
pubmed: 26954537
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;64(7):843-52
pubmed: 17606818