Using Relational Agents to Promote Family Communication Around Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management in the Diabetes Family Teamwork Online Intervention: Longitudinal Pilot Study.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 09 2019
Historique:
received: 01 07 2019
accepted: 13 08 2019
revised: 30 07 2019
entrez: 21 9 2019
pubmed: 21 9 2019
medline: 21 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Family conflict can reduce adolescent adherence to type 1 diabetes management tasks. The Family Teamwork in-person intervention was shown to be efficacious in reducing conflict and low adherence to diabetes-related tasks. Its reach and potential impact, however, were limited by the need to deliver the intervention sessions in person. Relational agents (ie, computerized versions of humans) have been shown to appeal to diverse audiences and may be an acceptable replacement for a human in technology-based behavior change interventions. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a pilot study assessing feasibility and acceptability of Diabetes Family Teamwork Online, an adapted version of the Family Teamwork intervention, delivered over the internet and guided by a relational agent. Parent-adolescent dyads were recruited through a diabetes care clinic at a large tertiary care hospital in the southwestern United States. A one-group design, with assessments at baseline, immediate postintervention, and 3 months later, was used to assess feasibility. A priori feasibility criteria included an assessment of recruitment, completion, attrition, program satisfaction, therapeutic alliance, attitudes toward the relational agent, and data collection. The institutional review board at Baylor College of Medicine approved the protocol (H-37245). Twenty-seven adolescents aged 10 to 15 years with type 1 diabetes and their parents were enrolled. Criteria used to assess feasibility were (1) recruitment goals were met (n=20), (2) families completed ≥75% of the modules, (3) attrition rate was ≤10%, (4) program satisfaction was high (≥80% of families), (5) therapeutic alliance was high (average score of ≥60/84), (6) families expressed positive attitudes toward the relational agent (average item score of ≥5 on ≥4 items), (7) ≥80% of data were collected at post 1 and post 2, and (8) few technical issues (≤10%) occurred during intervention delivery. All feasibility criteria were met. Qualitative data confirmed that adolescents and parents had positive reactions to both the content and approach. The Diabetes Family Teamwork Online intervention proved to be a feasible and acceptable method for enhancing communication around diabetes management tasks in families with an adolescent who has type 1 diabetes. RR2-10.2196/resprot.5817.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Family conflict can reduce adolescent adherence to type 1 diabetes management tasks. The Family Teamwork in-person intervention was shown to be efficacious in reducing conflict and low adherence to diabetes-related tasks. Its reach and potential impact, however, were limited by the need to deliver the intervention sessions in person. Relational agents (ie, computerized versions of humans) have been shown to appeal to diverse audiences and may be an acceptable replacement for a human in technology-based behavior change interventions.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a pilot study assessing feasibility and acceptability of Diabetes Family Teamwork Online, an adapted version of the Family Teamwork intervention, delivered over the internet and guided by a relational agent.
METHODS
Parent-adolescent dyads were recruited through a diabetes care clinic at a large tertiary care hospital in the southwestern United States. A one-group design, with assessments at baseline, immediate postintervention, and 3 months later, was used to assess feasibility. A priori feasibility criteria included an assessment of recruitment, completion, attrition, program satisfaction, therapeutic alliance, attitudes toward the relational agent, and data collection. The institutional review board at Baylor College of Medicine approved the protocol (H-37245).
RESULTS
Twenty-seven adolescents aged 10 to 15 years with type 1 diabetes and their parents were enrolled. Criteria used to assess feasibility were (1) recruitment goals were met (n=20), (2) families completed ≥75% of the modules, (3) attrition rate was ≤10%, (4) program satisfaction was high (≥80% of families), (5) therapeutic alliance was high (average score of ≥60/84), (6) families expressed positive attitudes toward the relational agent (average item score of ≥5 on ≥4 items), (7) ≥80% of data were collected at post 1 and post 2, and (8) few technical issues (≤10%) occurred during intervention delivery. All feasibility criteria were met. Qualitative data confirmed that adolescents and parents had positive reactions to both the content and approach.
CONCLUSIONS
The Diabetes Family Teamwork Online intervention proved to be a feasible and acceptable method for enhancing communication around diabetes management tasks in families with an adolescent who has type 1 diabetes.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
RR2-10.2196/resprot.5817.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31538940
pii: v21i9e15318
doi: 10.2196/15318
pmc: PMC6754689
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e15318

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R21 DK106505
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Debbe Thompson, Chishinga Callender, Caroline Gonynor, Karen W Cullen, Maria J Redondo, Ashley Butler, Barbara J Anderson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.09.2019.

Références

Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1219-24
pubmed: 22474040
J Sch Nurs. 2016 Oct;32(5):357-64
pubmed: 27044668
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86
pubmed: 8366922
Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):103-11
pubmed: 20182161
Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;32(4):388-396
pubmed: 22545980
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):21-30
pubmed: 16198215
Health Educ Res. 2013 Aug;28(4):704-14
pubmed: 23748162
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2076-84
pubmed: 20864705
Diabet Med. 2009 Sep;26(9):908-14
pubmed: 19719712
BMC Med. 2017 Nov 8;15(1):199
pubmed: 29115947
Diabetes Care. 2000 Dec;23(12):1794-8
pubmed: 11128355
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 02;13:709
pubmed: 23915235
Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):1947-53
pubmed: 19675206
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):140-2
pubmed: 21030194
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;39(3):481-97
pubmed: 20723815
Diabet Med. 2002 Aug;19(8):635-42
pubmed: 12147143
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):119-30
pubmed: 20235777
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1355-60
pubmed: 23034025
Diabetes Care. 2003 Nov;26(11):3067-73
pubmed: 14578241
J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Oct;35(9):937-49
pubmed: 20392790
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):602-4
pubmed: 20032275
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7
pubmed: 19362699
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):402-6
pubmed: 23741561
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Jun;43(3):251-259
pubmed: 28520550
Interact Comput. 2010 Jul 1;22(4):289-298
pubmed: 20628581
JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 Nov 21;1(2):e19
pubmed: 23612366
J Pediatr. 2003 Apr;142(4):409-16
pubmed: 12712059
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Oct;34(9):977-88
pubmed: 19270028
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Feb;9(1):60-7
pubmed: 17316099
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Jun;31(4):495-503
pubmed: 28080079
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 26;14(1):e1
pubmed: 22281837
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275-81
pubmed: 20299481
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):713-21
pubmed: 10332671
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1658-64
pubmed: 20587726
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jun;34(5):495-510
pubmed: 19029142
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 16;19(11):e383
pubmed: 29146567
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4:S60-7
pubmed: 19623191
JAMA. 2010 Feb 17;303(7):665-6
pubmed: 20159877
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011 Aug;49(8):22-9
pubmed: 21766736
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Apr;44(2):183-97
pubmed: 21220044
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Mar 28;6(2):null
pubmed: 29597246
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jul 28;5(3):e151
pubmed: 27468762

Auteurs

Debbe Thompson (D)

United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Chishinga Callender (C)

United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Caroline Gonynor (C)

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Karen W Cullen (KW)

United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Maria J Redondo (MJ)

Diabetes and Endocrinology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Ashley Butler (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Barbara J Anderson (BJ)

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH