Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study).


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 09 2019
Historique:
entrez: 23 9 2019
pubmed: 23 9 2019
medline: 2 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, possibly leading to longer term disuse. A Cochrane Review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. This trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthesis for older patients with vascular-related amputations and other health issues compared with a standard prosthesis. This feasibility trial is a pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard treatment with a more rigid prosthesis versus a self-aligning prosthesis. The target sample size is 90 patients, who are aged 50 years and over, and have a transtibial amputation, where amputation aetiology is mostly vascular-related or non-traumatic. Feasibility will be measured by consent and retention rates, a plausible future sample size over a 24-month recruitment period and completeness of outcome measures. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with trial participants to explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups with staff at prosthetics centres will explore barriers to successful delivery of the trial. Findings from the qualitative work will be integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes in order to inform the design of a full-scale RCT. Ethical approval was granted by Yorkshire and the Humber-Leeds West Research Ethics Committee on 4 May 2018. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, articles in relevant newsletters, presentations at relevant conferences and the patient advisory group. ISRCTN15043643.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31542768
pii: bmjopen-2019-032924
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924
pmc: PMC6756612
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN15043643']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e032924

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0816-20029
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Trials. 2014 Jul 03;15:264
pubmed: 24993581
Br J Rheumatol. 1997 May;36(5):551-9
pubmed: 9189057
J R Soc Med. 2014 Dec;107(12):483-9
pubmed: 25389229
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
South Med J. 2002 Aug;95(8):875-83
pubmed: 12190225
Gait Posture. 2013 Jul;38(3):466-70
pubmed: 23433546
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):743-8
pubmed: 15129398
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1031-7
pubmed: 11494181
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 Aug;30(2):213-23
pubmed: 16990231
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003978
pubmed: 14974050
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1314-23
pubmed: 21050130
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(3):429-37
pubmed: 25019665
Gait Posture. 2012 Jan;35(1):121-5
pubmed: 21955382
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Oct;39(5):380-9
pubmed: 24925671
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8
pubmed: 6805625
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;82(10):1432-40
pubmed: 11588750
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9
pubmed: 18295618
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2194-202
pubmed: 23856150
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Aug 5;25(15):833-44
pubmed: 12851094
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;98(1):105-113
pubmed: 27742450
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Dec;36(4):430-4
pubmed: 22440579
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):447-53
pubmed: 24590358
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Aug;85(8):1339-44
pubmed: 15295762

Auteurs

Natasha Mitchell (N)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Elizabeth Coleman (E)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Judith Watson (J)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Kerry Bell (K)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Catriona McDaid (C)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Cleveland Barnett (C)

School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

Martin Twiste (M)

United National Institute for Prosthetics & Orthotics Development, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Fergus Jepson (F)

Specialist Mobility Rehabilitation Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.

Abayomi Salawu (A)

Disability Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.

Dennis Harrison (D)

Public involvemment member, Hull, UK.

Natalie Vanicek (N)

Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK n.vanicek@hull.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH