Strategies for self-controlling social media use: Classification and role in preventing social media addiction symptoms.
addiction symptoms
excessive social media use
self-control strategies
trait self-control
Journal
Journal of behavioral addictions
ISSN: 2063-5303
Titre abrégé: J Behav Addict
Pays: Hungary
ID NLM: 101602037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2019
01 Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
24
9
2019
medline:
27
2
2020
entrez:
24
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many people present excessive patterns of social networking site (SNS) use and try to self-regulate it. However, little is known regarding the strategies employed by young adult SNS users and their role in preventing the emergence of addiction-like symptoms in relation to SNS use. In Study 1, we employed a naturalistic-qualitative approach for finding commonly employed self-control strategies in relation to SNS use. In Study 2, we examined differences between the frequency and difficulty of the strategies identified in Study 1 and tested the process through which trait self-control exerts influence on reducing SNS addiction symptomology. Study 1 revealed six families of self-control strategies, some reactive and some proactive. Study 2 pinpointed the most commonly used and most difficult to enact ones. It also showed that the difficulty to enact self-control strategies in relation to SNS use partially mediates the effect of trait self-control via SNS use habit on SNS addiction symptom severity. Taken together, the present findings revealed that strategies for self-controlling SNS use are common and complex. Their theoretical and clinical significance stems from their ability to prevent the translation of poor trait self-control and strong SNS use habit to the emergence of excessive use as manifested in SNS addiction-like symptoms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Many people present excessive patterns of social networking site (SNS) use and try to self-regulate it. However, little is known regarding the strategies employed by young adult SNS users and their role in preventing the emergence of addiction-like symptoms in relation to SNS use.
METHODS
METHODS
In Study 1, we employed a naturalistic-qualitative approach for finding commonly employed self-control strategies in relation to SNS use. In Study 2, we examined differences between the frequency and difficulty of the strategies identified in Study 1 and tested the process through which trait self-control exerts influence on reducing SNS addiction symptomology.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Study 1 revealed six families of self-control strategies, some reactive and some proactive. Study 2 pinpointed the most commonly used and most difficult to enact ones. It also showed that the difficulty to enact self-control strategies in relation to SNS use partially mediates the effect of trait self-control via SNS use habit on SNS addiction symptom severity.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Taken together, the present findings revealed that strategies for self-controlling SNS use are common and complex. Their theoretical and clinical significance stems from their ability to prevent the translation of poor trait self-control and strong SNS use habit to the emergence of excessive use as manifested in SNS addiction-like symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31545100
doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.49
pmc: PMC7044631
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
554-563Références
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):490-504
pubmed: 29280392
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1044-1055
pubmed: 30311770
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):131-41
pubmed: 23230991
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Sep;87(3):493-500
pubmed: 26589423
Front Psychol. 2014 May 16;5:444
pubmed: 24904463
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 17;6:99
pubmed: 25741299
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 24;8:857
pubmed: 25386130
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227
pubmed: 26821081
J Educ Psychol. 2016 Apr;108(3):329-341
pubmed: 27158155
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2639-40
pubmed: 21300864
J Res Pers. 2011 Jun 1;45(3):259-268
pubmed: 21643479
Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):501-17
pubmed: 22662404
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Dec;19(3):102-129
pubmed: 30760176
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1252-65
pubmed: 9599441
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1318-35
pubmed: 22149456
Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:91-103
pubmed: 25447023
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
pubmed: 20853993
J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271-324
pubmed: 15016066
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):495-525
pubmed: 20565167
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1170-6
pubmed: 17924815
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):601-610
pubmed: 29130329
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;11(1):35-55
pubmed: 26817725
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;15(4):352-66
pubmed: 21685152
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:455
pubmed: 27065923
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(5):347-53
pubmed: 23628698
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):508-25
pubmed: 25643222
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2014;36(2):246-254
pubmed: 24795501
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
pubmed: 18189009