Impact of Insulin-Treated and Noninsulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus in All-Comer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Polymer-Free Biolimus-Eluting Stent (from the RUDI-FREE Registry).
Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus
/ drug therapy
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ pharmacology
Insulin
/ therapeutic use
Male
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Polymers
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Sirolimus
/ analogs & derivatives
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2019
15 11 2019
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
revised:
30
07
2019
accepted:
02
08
2019
pubmed:
25
9
2019
medline:
24
3
2020
entrez:
25
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent evidences suggest a differential impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM on prognosis. We evaluated the clinical outcome of diabetic patients after PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent from the RUDI-FREE Registry, investigating a possible different prognostic impact of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated DM. A total of 1,104 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent, enrolled in the RUDI-FREE observational, multicenter, single-arm registry, were stratified by diabetic status; diabetic population was further divided on the basis of insulin treatment. Primary end points of the study were target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of cardiac death, stroke, and myocardial infarction). Multiple ischemic adverse events were also single-handedly considered as secondary end points. At 1 year, TLF was significantly higher in the diabetic cohort, as compared with nondiabetic patients (6.0% vs 3.1%, p 0.022). None of the end points resulted significantly different between nondiabetics and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients. Divergently, compared with nondiabetic, insulin-treated diabetic patients faced significant higher rates of TLF (10.8% vs 3.1%, p 0.003), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (10.8% vs 3.4%, p 0.004), and of most of the analyzed adverse events. In conclusion, patients with DM had a higher risk of TLF compared with nondiabetics; nonetheless, the worse outcome of the diabetic population seems to be driven by the insulin-treated diabetic subpopulation. This finding suggests a different risk profile of insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetic patients in the modern era of PCI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31547997
pii: S0002-9149(19)30956-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.015
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Insulin
0
Polymers
0
umirolimus
U36PGF65JH
Sirolimus
W36ZG6FT64
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1518-1527Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.