Benefit and Risks of Aspirin in Addition to Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized GLOBAL LEADERS Trial.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Aspirin
/ administration & dosage
Cause of Death
Continuity of Patient Care
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Internationality
Male
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Analysis
Tertiary Care Centers
Ticagrelor
/ administration & dosage
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
27
9
2019
medline:
16
7
2020
entrez:
27
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of aspirin as part of antiplatelet regimens in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) needs to be clarified in the context of newer potent P2Y12 antagonists. To evaluate the benefit and risks of aspirin in addition to ticagrelor among patients with ACS beyond 1 month after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is a nonprespecified, post hoc analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS, a randomized, open-label superiority trial comparing 2 antiplatelet treatment strategies after PCI. The trial included 130 secondary/tertiary care hospitals in different countries, with 15 991 unselected patients with stable coronary artery disease or ACS undergoing PCI. Patients had outpatient visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after index procedure. The experimental group received aspirin plus ticagrelor for 1 month followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy; the reference group received aspirin plus either clopidogrel (stable coronary artery disease) or ticagrelor (ACS) for 12 months, followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. In this analysis, we examined the clinical outcomes occurring between 31 days and 365 days after randomization, specifically in patients with ACS who, within this time frame, were assigned to receive either ticagrelor alone or ticagrelor and aspirin. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction. Of 15 968 participants, there were 7487 patients with ACS enrolled; 3750 patients were assigned to the experimental group and 3737 patients to the reference group. Between 31 and 365 days after randomization, the primary outcome occurred in 55 patients (1.5%) in the experimental group and in 75 patients (2.0%) in the reference group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.03; P = .07); investigator-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined bleeding type 3 or 5 occurred in 28 patients (0.8%) in the experimental group and in 54 patients (1.5%) in the reference arm (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.81; P = .004). Between 1 month and 12 months after PCI in ACS, aspirin was associated with increased bleeding risk and appeared not to add to the benefit of ticagrelor on ischemic events. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis generating; however, they pave the way for further trials evaluating aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies after PCI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813435.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31557763
pii: 2752077
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3355
pmc: PMC6764000
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01813435']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1092-1101Références
Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):544-54
pubmed: 21709065
Platelets. 2013;24(8):615-24
pubmed: 23249161
Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1233-43
pubmed: 20817281
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):480-496
pubmed: 29973709
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 20;15(12):e1090-e1098
pubmed: 30888959
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949
pubmed: 30166073
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Feb;7(1):19-28
pubmed: 24309957
Lancet. 2010 Jan 23;375(9711):283-93
pubmed: 20079528
Platelets. 2019;30(2):148-157
pubmed: 30759035
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;17(2):164-72
pubmed: 21697355
Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650
pubmed: 29891620
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;110(4):777-84
pubmed: 23884248
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):603-612
pubmed: 28089180
EuroIntervention. 2016 Nov 20;12(10):1239-1245
pubmed: 26606735
Am Heart J. 2016 Dec;182:125-134
pubmed: 27914492
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57
pubmed: 19717846
Br J Haematol. 2000 Sep;110(4):925-34
pubmed: 11054084
Heart. 2010 Nov;96(21):1693-4
pubmed: 20956485
Lancet. 1996 Nov 16;348(9038):1329-39
pubmed: 8918275
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1851-1864
pubmed: 27595509
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437