Effect of Screw Channel Angulation on Reverse Torque Values of Dental Implant Abutment Screws.

Angled screw channel dental implants reverse torque screw loosening

Journal

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
accepted: 20 09 2019
pubmed: 29 9 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 28 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the reverse torque values (RTVs) of abutment screws tightened from three different angles. Implant abutment screws (n = 48), abutments (3), and regular platform implant analogs (3) were divided into three angulation groups (n = 16/group). Custom guides of 0°, 10°, and 20° were fabricated to verify driver angulation. The implant components for each group were assembled and all screws torqued to 35 Ncm using a universal screwdriver in a manual torque wrench at the appropriate angle. Torque was reapplied 10 minutes after initial torque. A digital gauge was then used to measure reverse torque at a position parallel (0°) to the implant analog. RTVs were recorded and compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05). All mean RTVs fell below the targeted torque value of 35Ncm, with some values in each angulation group 10% below of the target value. Mean RTVs in descending order from targeted torque value were: 10° group = 32.07 ± 0.97 Ncm, 0° group = 31.16 ± 1.12 Ncm, and 20° group = 30.08 ± 0.88 Ncm. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between angulation groups (F = 15.954, p < 0.001). Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons revealed that the mean RTVs of the three angulation groups were significantly different from each other (0° vs. 10°: p = 0.033; 0° vs. 20°: p = 0.011; 10° vs. 20°: p < 0.001). All RTVs did not reach the targeted torque value of 35 Ncm. Mean screw RTVs were significantly influenced by screwdriver insertion angulation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31560132
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13111
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

969-972

Informations de copyright

© 2019 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Références

Misch CE, Resnik R: Misch's Avoiding Complications in Oral Implantology (ed 1). St. Louis, MO, Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017
Hebel KS, Gajjar RC: Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35
Garcia-Gazaui S, Razzoog M, Sierraalta M, et al: Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:621-624
Sethi A, Sochor P: The lateral fixation screw in implant dentistry. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:39-43
Gjelvold B, Sohrabi MM, Chrcanovic BR: Angled screw channel: an alternative to cemented single-implant restorations-three clinical examples. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:74-76
Berroeta E, Zabalegui I, Donovan T, et al: Dynamic abutment: a method of redirecting screw access for implant-supported restorations: technical details and a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:516-519
Hanif A, Qureshi S, Sheikh Z, et al: Complications in implant dentistry. Eur J Dent 2017;11:135
Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. The relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73
Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, et al: Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: an overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:242-245
Myers RL, Myers RL: The Basics of Physics. Westport, CT, Greenwood Publishing Group; 2006
Goldberg J, Lee T, Phark JH, et al: Removal torque and force to failure of non-axially tightened implant abutment screws. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:322-326
Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, et al: Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:592-599
Albayrak H, Gumus HO, Tursun F, et al: Accuracy of torque-limiting devices: a comparative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:81-86
L'Homme-Langlois E, Yilmaz B, Chien HH: Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:524-528
Gumus HO, Zortuk M, Albayrak H: Effect of fluid contamination on reverse torque values in bone-level implants. Implant Dent 2014;23:582-587

Auteurs

Eric Hu (E)

Naval Postgraduate Dental School - Prosthodontics, Bethesda, MD.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Anton Petrich (A)

Naval Postgraduate Dental School - Prosthodontics, Bethesda, MD.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Glen Imamura (G)

Naval Postgraduate Dental School - Prosthodontics, Bethesda, MD.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Christopher Hamlin (C)

Naval Postgraduate Dental School - Prosthodontics, Bethesda, MD.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Articles similaires

Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations.

Lucas Eigi Borges Tanaka, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tércio Vieira Grangeiro et al.
1.00
Composite Resins Materials Testing Printing, Three-Dimensional Surface Properties Flexural Strength

Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.

Eman Mostafa Awad, Mohamed Maamoun ElSheikh, Azza Abd El Moneim El-Segai
1.00
Dental Impression Technique Humans Dental Implants Computer-Aided Design Dental Impression Materials
Humans Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Male Middle Aged Female
Humans Male Middle Aged Female Adult

Classifications MeSH