Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
/ epidemiology
Feasibility Studies
Female
Focus Groups
General Practitioners
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitalization
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Independent Living
Male
Pharmacists
/ organization & administration
Risk Assessment
Rural Population
Tasmania
Adverse effect
Aging
Primary care
Risk factors
Safety
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
12
06
2019
accepted:
07
09
2019
pubmed:
30
9
2019
medline:
30
4
2020
entrez:
30
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Adverse drug reactions are common in Australian general practice and can be a cause of, or contribute to, preventable hospital admissions. Developing practical tools to assist in identifying patients who are at high risk of serious adverse drug reactions is an important step in preventing these hospitalisations. Objective The aims of the study were to apply the Prediction of Hospitalisation due to Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly Community-Dwelling Patients (PADR-EC) Score to assess the risk of medication-related hospitalisation among patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a rural general practice, and to investigate general practitioners' acceptance of the PADR-EC Score. Setting The project was based in a multicentre rural general practice in southern Tasmania, Australia. Method We conducted a cross-sectional study wherein the PADR-EC score was administered to patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a general practice. A focus group of general practice doctors was conducted and thematic analysis of the transcript used to explore their views regarding the utility of the PADR-EC score. Main Outcome Measures Successful application of the PADR-EC Score and an evaluation of general practitioners' acceptance of the PADR-EC Score are the two outcome measures of the project. Results The PADR-EC score was applied by the practice pharmacist and reported to GPs for 428 patients aged ≥ 65 years, with 24.8% classified as high-risk. The focus group found the PADR-EC score helped raise awareness of the risk of adverse drug reactions in the general practice setting. Doctors demonstrated good understanding of the PADR-EC Score and there were no negative reactions to the delivery model used. No changes to prescribing were implemented directly as a result of the PADR-EC Score, but more caution was used when doctors provided their usual clinical care. Conclusion Doctors used the PADR-EC score to complement their decision making. The PADR-EC Score was used as a reminder to review existing medication lists, follow-up on pathology results that may impact drug treatment and assess patients for prevalent ADRs. Further research is needed to validate the PADR-EC score in this setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31564043
doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00908-1
pii: 10.1007/s11096-019-00908-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM