The impact of intensified clinical care on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa: Quasi-experimental study.
Adult
Biomarkers
/ blood
Blood Glucose
/ drug effects
Community Health Centers
Cross-Over Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ blood
Feasibility Studies
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ metabolism
Glycemic Control
/ adverse effects
Group Processes
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Office Visits
Patient Education as Topic
Point-of-Care Testing
Primary Health Care
South Africa
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Diabetes group education
Diabetes mellitus
Guideline implementation
Patient education and counselling
Point-of-care testing
Primary care
Primary health care
Journal
Primary care diabetes
ISSN: 1878-0210
Titre abrégé: Prim Care Diabetes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101463825
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
15
07
2019
revised:
17
08
2019
accepted:
29
08
2019
pubmed:
1
10
2019
medline:
10
4
2021
entrez:
1
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim was to evaluate the effect on glycaemic control of more intensive care for patients with very uncontrolled type-2 diabetes (HbA1c>10%) at Khayelitsha Community Health Centre, South Africa. A pragmatic, quasi-experimental study. Patients with HBA1c>10% were consecutively selected into a 6-month programme of intensified care involving monthly visits to a doctor, diabetes group education, escalation of treatment, and more frequent HbA1c testing by either point-of-care (POC) or laboratory. Participants were their own controls in a retrospective analysis of usual care during the previous year. At baseline 236 patients had a mean HbA1c of 12.1%. The mean difference in HbA1c in the intervention group was -1.1% (p<0.001). The intervention group were exposed to group diabetes education (100% vs 0%), more visits (3.8 vs 3.2, p<0.001), more HbA1c tests (2.2 vs 0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in increased dose of insulin between the groups or between POC and standard laboratory intervention sub-groups. The introduction of group diabetes education was the most likely explanation for improved glycaemic control in this poor, under-resourced, public sector, peri-urban setting. The study demonstrates a feasible approach to improving diabetes care in the South African context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31564516
pii: S1751-9918(19)30306-7
doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Blood Glucose
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
Types de publication
Clinical Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
97-103Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.