Split dose versus full single-dose regimen of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: a pilot study of randomized controlled trial.


Journal

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 1473-5687
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9000874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
entrez: 1 10 2019
pubmed: 1 10 2019
medline: 7 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous meta-analyses in adults comparing a full single dose vs. split doses of polyethylene glycol with electrolyte solution demonstrated that the split-dose group had a higher rate of successful bowel preparation. To date, no similar study in children has been conducted. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of bowel preparation between the two regimens of polyethylene glycol with electrolyte solution in pediatric colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes were tolerability, acceptability, and compliance. An investigator-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted to enroll children aged 2-18 years who underwent an elective colonoscopy at a teaching hospital between March 2018 and February 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive polyethylene glycol with electrolyte solution as a full single dose or two split doses. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was used for the efficacy (i.e. successful bowel preparation if score ≥ 6). Secondary outcomes were evaluated by using a standardized questionnaire. A total of 45 colonoscopies (22 in the full single-dose and 23 in the split-dose group) were performed. Mean age was 9.2 years old (SD 4.4). We noted a higher rate of successful bowel preparation in the split-dose group (95% vs. 72%, P = 0.047). Significant higher rate of willingness to repeat the same protocol (83% vs. 36%, P = 0.002) and a trend of lower rate of nausea/vomiting (39% vs. 68%, P = 0.051) in the split-dose group were found. The split-dose regimen of polyethylene glycol with electrolyte solution for bowel preparation suggests superior efficacy, potential tolerability, and acceptability as compared to the traditional full single-dose regimen.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31567637
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001562
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cathartics 0
Electrolytes 0
Polyethylene Glycols 3WJQ0SDW1A

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1382-1386

Auteurs

Hansa Sriphongphankul (H)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Pornthep Tanpowpong (P)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.

Chatmanee Lertudomphonwanit (C)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.

Suporn Treepongkaruna (S)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH