Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
depressive disorders
diagnostic interviews
individual participant data meta-analysis
major depression
Journal
International journal of methods in psychiatric research
ISSN: 1557-0657
Titre abrégé: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9111433
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
14
05
2019
revised:
05
08
2019
accepted:
16
08
2019
pubmed:
1
10
2019
medline:
14
5
2020
entrez:
1
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31568624
doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803
pmc: PMC7027670
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1803Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH64476
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 211374/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : CIHR
ID : KRS-140994
Pays : Canada
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH064476
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1210-12002
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DOH95F022
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 071571
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DOH94F044
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 082384/Z/07/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-DG-1108-10012
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_MR/R01910X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
ID : 5 R01HD045735
Pays : International
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH080290
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S035818/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23MH080290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD045735
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;39(6):674-7
pubmed: 7092500
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Dec;28(4):e1803
pubmed: 31568624
J Affect Disord. 2010 Nov;126(3):335-48
pubmed: 20207007
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 21;184(3):E191-6
pubmed: 22184363
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;212(6):377-385
pubmed: 29717691
Psychol Med. 2004 Aug;34(6):1013-24
pubmed: 15554572
Psychol Med. 2001 Aug;31(6):1001-13
pubmed: 11513368
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 20;5(10):e009742
pubmed: 26486977
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Dec;45(12):1069-77
pubmed: 2848472
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;42(7):667-75
pubmed: 4015308
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jul;13(36):1-145, 147-230
pubmed: 19624978
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396
pubmed: 29362800
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65
pubmed: 25919529
J Psychiatr Res. 1998 Nov-Dec;32(6):353-60
pubmed: 9844951
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76
pubmed: 26195347