Investigating the potential of sunflower species, fermented palm wine and Pleurotus ostreatus for treatment of petroleum-contaminated soil.


Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 17 07 2019
revised: 11 09 2019
accepted: 14 09 2019
pubmed: 2 10 2019
medline: 24 1 2020
entrez: 2 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Phyto- and myco-remediation have been identified as sustainable options for treatment of petroleum-contaminated soils. To appraise the benefits thereof, the potentials of 3 sunflower species, 2 palm wine types and P. ostreatus to treat petroleum-contaminated soils was investigated. The study involved sampling of petroleum-contaminated soils and treatment with the phyto- and myco-remediation agents for a period of 90-days. Agents used for the remediation were 3 species of sunflowers (Helianthus annus-pacino gold, Helianthus sunsation &Helianthus annus-sunny dwarf), fermented palm wine (from 2 species of palm trees -Elaeis guineensis &Raffia africana), and oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). The study further investigated variation in remediation efficiency among the sunflower and palm wine species, as well as different substrates and conditions for optimal application of P. ostreatus. The results obtained revealed up to 340 g/kg dry weight of Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in the soils, with remediation outcomes of up to 69% by the sunflower- Helianthus annus (Pacino gold), 70% by fermented palm wine, and 85% by P. ostreatus. While the remediation efficiency of sunflower species was proportional to biomass, there was no significant difference in remediation efficiency of the palm wines. It was also found that substrates type and method of application has a significant impact on the remediation efficiency of P. ostreatus. The study further revealed available nitrate and electrical conductivity as possible useful indicators of TPHs concentration and remediation progress in soils.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31574438
pii: S0045-6535(19)32120-4
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124881
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Petroleum 0
Soil 0
Soil Pollutants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

124881

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Udeme John Dickson (UJ)

School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, United Kingdom. Electronic address: uj.dickson@yahoo.com.

Michael Coffey (M)

Department of Chemistry & Forensic Sciences, School of Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton, NG11 8NS, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Robert John George Mortimer (RJ)

School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, United Kingdom.

Barry Smith (B)

School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, United Kingdom.

Nicholas Ray (N)

School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, United Kingdom.

Marcello Di Bonito (M)

School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil

Classifications MeSH