Relation of Lipid-Lowering Therapy to Need for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Asymptomatic Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticholesteremic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ complications
Asymptomatic Diseases
Biomarkers
/ blood
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Dyslipidemias
/ blood
Echocardiography, Doppler
Ezetimibe
/ therapeutic use
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ trends
Humans
Lipoproteins, LDL
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Simvastatin
/ therapeutic use
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2019
01 12 2019
Historique:
received:
14
05
2019
revised:
16
08
2019
accepted:
20
08
2019
pubmed:
7
10
2019
medline:
27
3
2020
entrez:
7
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, we aimed to determine if pretreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and aortic stenosis (AS) severity alter the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy on reducing aortic valve replacement (AVR). We used 1,687 patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS, who were randomly assigned (1:1) to 40/10 mg simvastatin/ezetimibe combination versus. placebo in the simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis (SEAS) trial. Pretreatment LDL levels (>4 mmol/L) and peak aortic jet velocity (3 m/s) were used to partition study participants into 4 groups, which were followed for a primary endpoint of AVR. Cox regression with tests for interaction was used to study the effect of randomized treatment in each subgroup. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR 4.2 to 4.7 years; total 7,396 patient-years of follow-up), 478 (28%) patients underwent AVR and 146 (9%) died. A significant risk dependency was detected between simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, LDL levels and mild versus moderate AS on rates of AVR (p = 0.01 for interaction). In stratified analyses, randomized treatment, therefore, reduced the rate of AVR in patients with LDL levels >4 mmol and mild AS at baseline (HR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.9). There was no detectable effect of randomized treatment on the need for AVR in the 3 other participants subgroups. We conclude, that in a secondary analysis from a prospective randomized clinical trial, treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe combination reduced the need for AVR in a subset of patients with mild AS and high pretreatment LDL levels (Unique identifier on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00092677).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31586530
pii: S0002-9149(19)31006-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.037
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticholesteremic Agents
0
Biomarkers
0
Lipoproteins, LDL
0
Simvastatin
AGG2FN16EV
Ezetimibe
EOR26LQQ24
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00092677']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1736-1740Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.