Evaluating the sensitivity of Halcyon's automatic transit image acquisition for treatment error detection: A phantom study using static IMRT.
Algorithms
Calibration
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Male
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Particle Accelerators
/ instrumentation
Phantoms, Imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Quality Assurance, Health Care
/ standards
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ methods
EPID
exit dosimetry
patient-specific QA
transit images
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
revised:
12
07
2019
accepted:
11
09
2019
pubmed:
7
10
2019
medline:
14
4
2020
entrez:
7
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Varian Halcyon™ electronic portal imaging detector is always in-line with the beam and automatically acquires transit images for every patient with full-field coverage. These images could be used for "every patient, every monitor unit" quality assurance (QA) and eventually adaptive radiotherapy. This study evaluated the imager's sensitivity to potential clinical errors and day-to-day variations from clinical exit images. Open and modulated fields were delivered for each potential error. To evaluate output changes, monitor units were scaled by 2%-10% and delivered to solid water slabs and a homogeneous CIRS phantom. To mimic weight changes, 0.5-5.0 cm of buildup was added to the solid water. To evaluate positioning changes, a homogeneous and heterogeneous CIRS phantom were shifted 2-10 cm and 0.2-1.5 cm, respectively. For each test, mean relative differences (MRDs) and standard deviations in the pixel-difference histograms (σ MRDs responded linearly to output and buildup changes with a standard deviation of 0.3%, implying a 1% output change and 0.2 cm changes in buildup could be detected with 2.5σ confidence. Shifting the homogenous phantom laterally resulted in detectable MRD and σ Rapid analyses of automatically acquired Halcyon™ exit images could detect mid-treatment changes with high sensitivity, though appropriate thresholds will need to be set. This study presents the first steps toward developing effortless image evaluation for all aspects of every patient's treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31587477
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12749
pmc: PMC6839375
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131-143Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS025440
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Aug 20;63(16):165013
pubmed: 30051879
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5359-73
pubmed: 19994544
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):516-22
pubmed: 26460993
Phys Med Biol. 1995 Nov;40(11):1943-55
pubmed: 8587942
Med Phys. 2007 Oct;34(10):3872-84
pubmed: 17985633
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Nov;49(2):125-32
pubmed: 10052877
Med Phys. 2013 Sep;40(9):091907
pubmed: 24007158
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 08;17(6):292-304
pubmed: 27929502
Med Phys. 2005 Dec;32(12):3558-68
pubmed: 16475754
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):e679-87
pubmed: 26421834
Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5477-89
pubmed: 21992366
Med Phys. 2005 Sep;32(9):2805-18
pubmed: 16266095
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Sep 1;42(2):437-54
pubmed: 9788427
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 21;59(16):4749-68
pubmed: 25088064
Med Phys. 1998 May;25(5):656-61
pubmed: 9608475
Med Phys. 2006 Feb;33(2):259-73
pubmed: 16532930
Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):3969
pubmed: 27370115
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83
pubmed: 29443390
Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):5067-72
pubmed: 21978051
Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):6945-54
pubmed: 26632050
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1501-7
pubmed: 26179632
Med Phys. 2009 Apr;36(4):1389-98
pubmed: 19472646
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):1037-44
pubmed: 21452741
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Feb 1;31(3):593-603
pubmed: 7852125
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1568-77
pubmed: 17394951
Med Phys. 2013 Mar;40(3):031713
pubmed: 23464308
Stat Med. 1996 Jan 15;15(1):103-12
pubmed: 8614741
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Sep;88(3):289-309
pubmed: 18706727
Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):584-94
pubmed: 16878562
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):204-9
pubmed: 24210671
Radiother Oncol. 1993 Nov;29(2):237-43
pubmed: 8310151
Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1618-27
pubmed: 12906179
Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec;35(6):612-7
pubmed: 23165357
Phys Med Biol. 1986 Sep;31(9):985-92
pubmed: 3774878
Med Phys. 2007 Oct;34(10):3815-24
pubmed: 17985627
Radiother Oncol. 2004 May;71(2):223-34
pubmed: 15110457
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2638-44
pubmed: 20632575
Med Phys. 2001 Jun;28(6):911-24
pubmed: 11439488
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2516-24
pubmed: 20632563