Standardized acquisition and post-processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in patients with brain tumors, cerebrovascular disease and dementia: comparability of post-processing software.
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Cerebrovascular Disorders
/ diagnostic imaging
Contrast Media
Dementia
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
/ methods
Male
Organometallic Compounds
Perfusion
Software
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
10
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
entrez:
17
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
MR-perfusion post-processing still lacks standardization. This study evaluates the results of perfusion analysis with two established software solutions in a large series of patients with different diseases when a highly standardized processing workflow is ensured. Multicenter data of 260 patients (80 with brain tumors, 124 with cerebrovascular disease and 56 with dementia examined with the same MR protocol) were analyzed. Raw data sets were processed with two software suites: Olea sphere and NordicICE. Group differences were analyzed with paired Perfusion metrics were significantly different for all examined diseases in the unaffected brain for both software suites [ratio cortex/white matter left hemisphere: mean transit time (MTT) 0.991 Despite a highly standardized workflow, parametric perfusion maps are depended on the chosen software. Radiologists should consider software related variances when using dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion for clinical imaging and research. This multicenter study compared perfusion parameters calculated by two commercial dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion post-processing software solutions in different central nervous system disorders with a large sample size and a highly standardized processing workflow. Despite, parametric perfusion maps are depended on the chosen software which impacts clinical imaging and research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31617743
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190543
pmc: PMC6948086
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Organometallic Compounds
0
gadobutrol
1BJ477IO2L
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190543Références
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Jul;31(7):1381-95
pubmed: 22410325
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(1-2):131-8
pubmed: 27088711
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Oct;76(4):1282-90
pubmed: 26519871
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Apr 10;16(2):129-136
pubmed: 27646457
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Feb;50:107-118
pubmed: 27951412
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Dec;36(12):2242-9
pubmed: 26359151
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jul;50(1):164-74
pubmed: 12815691
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1237-47
pubmed: 14648572
Neuroradiology. 2013 Oct;55(10):1197-203
pubmed: 23852431
Radiol Med. 2017 Apr;122(4):294-302
pubmed: 28070841
Schizophr Res. 2015 Jun;165(1):38-44
pubmed: 25888338
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Mar;55(3):524-31
pubmed: 16453314
J Neurooncol. 2015 May;122(3):497-505
pubmed: 25773062
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4129-4144
pubmed: 28332014
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13(1):45-50
pubmed: 24492744
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2795-9
pubmed: 26306755
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
CNS Oncol. 2014 Nov;3(6):407-19
pubmed: 25438812
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(5):647-54
pubmed: 24879459
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;24(4):649-670
pubmed: 27742108
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):859-67
pubmed: 16611779
Transl Oncol. 2015 Jun;8(3):137-46
pubmed: 26055170
Stroke. 2008 May;39(5):1621-8
pubmed: 18403743