Efficacy of antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes (the AIM study): double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre trial.
Adult
Amoxicillin
/ administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Chronic Pain
/ diagnosis
Disability Evaluation
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
/ complications
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
/ complications
Low Back Pain
/ diagnosis
Lumbar Vertebrae
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Norway
Pain Measurement
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2019
16 10 2019
Historique:
entrez:
18
10
2019
pubmed:
18
10
2019
medline:
28
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the efficacy of three months of antibiotic treatment compared with placebo in patients with chronic low back pain, previous disc herniation, and vertebral endplate changes (Modic changes). Double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, multicentre trial. Hospital outpatient clinics at six hospitals in Norway. 180 patients with chronic low back pain, previous disc herniation, and type 1 (n=118) or type 2 (n=62) Modic changes enrolled from June 2015 to September 2017. Patients were randomised to three months of oral treatment with either 750 mg amoxicillin or placebo three times daily. The allocation sequence was concealed by using a computer generated number on the prescription. The primary outcome was the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score (range 0-24) at one year follow-up in the intention to treat population. The minimal clinically important between group difference in mean RMDQ score was predefined as 4. In the primary analysis of the total cohort at one year, the difference in the mean RMDQ score between the amoxicillin group and the placebo group was -1.6 (95% confidence interval -3.1 to 0.0, P=0.04). In the secondary analysis, the difference in the mean RMDQ score between the groups was -2.3 (-4.2 to-0.4, P=0.02) for patients with type 1 Modic changes and -0.1 (-2.7 to 2.6, P=0.95) for patients with type 2 Modic changes. Fifty patients (56%) in the amoxicillin group experienced at least one drug related adverse event compared with 31 (34%) in the placebo group. In this study on patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes at the level of a previous disc herniation, three months of treatment with amoxicillin did not provide a clinically important benefit compared with placebo. Secondary analyses and sensitivity analyses supported this finding. Therefore, our results do not support the use of antibiotic treatment for chronic low back pain and Modic changes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02323412.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31619437
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5654
pmc: PMC6812614
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Amoxicillin
804826J2HU
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02323412']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
l5654Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from governmental organisations Helse Sør-Øst and Helse Vest for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3723-3734
pubmed: 26914098
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4
pubmed: 18165753
Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747
pubmed: 27745712
Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):196-201
pubmed: 23506164
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):697-707
pubmed: 23404353
J Clin Invest. 2014 Oct;124(10):4162-5
pubmed: 25271724
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Apr;25(2):143-56
pubmed: 15020033
J Rehabil Med. 2003 Sep;35(5):241-7
pubmed: 14582557
Trials. 2017 Dec 15;18(1):596
pubmed: 29246188
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200677
pubmed: 30067777
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Apr 17;13:657-667
pubmed: 29713150
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):2021-2027
pubmed: 28882866
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Nov;77(6):967-70
pubmed: 7593116
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):31
pubmed: 30658613
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1756-62
pubmed: 22498993
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1704-5
pubmed: 23852437
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):595-602
pubmed: 15878473
Eur Spine J. 1993 Oct;2(3):145-8
pubmed: 20058467
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;33(7):345-54
pubmed: 9689897
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869
pubmed: 20332511
BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1377
pubmed: 15556955
BMC Med. 2015 Jan 22;13:13
pubmed: 25609421
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1397-404
pubmed: 24021611
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1702
pubmed: 23846729
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Feb 4;26(3):162-5
pubmed: 14754627
Anaerobe. 2006 Oct-Dec;12(5-6):207-10
pubmed: 17000123
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 May;29(5):838-42
pubmed: 18272564
Radiology. 1988 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):193-9
pubmed: 3336678
Lancet. 2001 Jun 23;357(9273):2024-5
pubmed: 11438138
Pain. 1993 Feb;52(2):157-68
pubmed: 8455963
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9612437
pubmed: 26925420
Eur Spine J. 2008 Nov;17(11):1407-22
pubmed: 18787845
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 1;41(13):E764-9
pubmed: 26656049