Prevalence of contact allergy to metals: nickel, palladium, and cobalt in Southern Sweden from 1995-2016.


Journal

Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
revised: 09 10 2019
accepted: 17 10 2019
pubmed: 19 10 2019
medline: 23 9 2020
entrez: 19 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In 2001, the EU nickel directive was introduced to prevent contact allergy to nickel. Contact allergy to palladium and/or cobalt is often seen together with contact allergy to nickel. To compare the contact allergy prevalence of nickel, palladium, and cobalt allergy before and after the introduction of the EU nickel directive in consecutive patients with dermatitis. A retrospective analysis of patch test results from 1995-2016 was performed (n = 18 264). Chi-square tests were used to examine trends for nickel, palladium, and cobalt across test years. Logistic regression was used for associations. The prevalence of nickel allergy decreased significantly in the youngest age group (6-30 years) for both female and male patients from 1995-1999 to 2012-2016: females: 33.4% to 19.1% (P < .001); males: 5.9% to 2.1% (P < .05). The concomitant reactions between nickel and palladium and nickel and cobalt among young females, respectively, also decreased significantly. Isolated palladium and cobalt allergy remained stable (1.4% and 2.3%, respectively) during the same time period for both men and women. The prevalence of nickel has decreased among young females and males suspected of contact allergy in Southern Sweden after the introduction of the EU nickel directive. There has been no change in isolated palladium or cobalt allergy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In 2001, the EU nickel directive was introduced to prevent contact allergy to nickel. Contact allergy to palladium and/or cobalt is often seen together with contact allergy to nickel.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To compare the contact allergy prevalence of nickel, palladium, and cobalt allergy before and after the introduction of the EU nickel directive in consecutive patients with dermatitis.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective analysis of patch test results from 1995-2016 was performed (n = 18 264). Chi-square tests were used to examine trends for nickel, palladium, and cobalt across test years. Logistic regression was used for associations.
RESULTS RESULTS
The prevalence of nickel allergy decreased significantly in the youngest age group (6-30 years) for both female and male patients from 1995-1999 to 2012-2016: females: 33.4% to 19.1% (P < .001); males: 5.9% to 2.1% (P < .05). The concomitant reactions between nickel and palladium and nickel and cobalt among young females, respectively, also decreased significantly. Isolated palladium and cobalt allergy remained stable (1.4% and 2.3%, respectively) during the same time period for both men and women.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of nickel has decreased among young females and males suspected of contact allergy in Southern Sweden after the introduction of the EU nickel directive. There has been no change in isolated palladium or cobalt allergy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31626332
doi: 10.1111/cod.13422
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cobalt 3G0H8C9362
Palladium 5TWQ1V240M
Nickel 7OV03QG267

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

218-226

Subventions

Organisme : Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association's Research Foundation

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:319-329.
General advice regarding ear piercing. National Board of Health and Welfare SOSFS. 1989; 40 (in Swedish).
European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC. Off J Eur Union. 1994;L-188:1-2.
Commission Directive 2004/96/EC of September 27, 2004 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the mareting and useeof nickel for percing post assemblies for the purpose of Adapting its Annex I to echnical progress. Off J Eur Union. 2004.
Wahlberg JE, Boman AS. Cross-reactivity to palladium and nickel studied in the Guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol. 1992;72:95-97.
Hindsén M, Spirén A, Bruze M. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:2-8.
Pistoor FH, Kapsenberg ML, Bos JD, Meinardi MM, von Blomberg ME, Scheper RJ. Cross-reactivity of human nickel-reactive T-lymphocyte clones with copper and palladium. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;105:92-95.
Moulon C, Vollmer J, Weltzien HU. Characterization of processing requirements and metal cross-reactivities in T cell clones from patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:3308-3315.
Bordignon V, Palamara F, Cordiali-Fei P, et al. Nickel, palladium and rhodium induced IFN-gamma and IL-10 production as assessed by in vitro ELISpot-analysis in contact dermatitis patients. BMC Immunol. 2008;9:19.
Muris J, Kleverlaan CJ, Rustemeyer T, et al. Sodium tetrachloropalladate for diagnosing palladium sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:94-100.
Faurschou AMT, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP. Metal allergen of the 21st century-a review on exposure, epidemiology and clinical manifestations of palladium allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:185-195.
Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Carlsen BC, Menné T. Prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy among female patients with dermatitis before and after Danish government regulation: a 23-year retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:799-805.
Wahlberg JE, Lidén C. Cross-reactivity patterns of cobalt and nickel studied with repeated open applications (ROATS) to the skin of Guinea pigs. Am J Contact Dermat. 2000;11:42-48.
Thyssen JP. Cobalt sensitization and dermatitis: considerations for the clinician. Dermatitis. 2012;23:203-209.
Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact sensitization to cobalt-multifactorial analysis of risk factors based on long-term data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71:326-337.
Lidén C, Bruze M, Thyssen JC, Menné T. Metals. Contact Dermatitis. Vol 2011. 5th ed. Springer; 2011:642-680.
Lidén C. Nickel in jewellery and associated products. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:73-75.
Hindsén M, Persson L, Gruvberger B. Allergic contact dermatitis from cobalt in jewellery. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:350-351.
Cristaudo A, Bordignon V, Petrucci F, et al. Release of palladium from biomechanical prostheses in body fluids can induce or support PD-specific IFNgamma T cell responses and the clinical setting of a palladium hypersensitivity. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22:605-614.
Finch TM, Prais L, Foulds IS. Palladium allergy in a British patch test clinic population. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:351-352.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:195-221.
Carøe C, Andersen KE, Mortz CG. Fluctuations in the prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy in eczema patients patch tested after implementation of the nickel regulation in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:126-131.
Schnuch A, Schwitulla J. Decrease in nickel allergy in women after the second EU nickel directive. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69:253-256.
Garg S, Thyssen JP, Uter W, et al. Nickel allergy following European Union regulation in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the U.K. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169:854-858.
Lidén C, Johnsson S. Nickel on the Swedish market before the Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:7-12.
Biesterbos J, Yazar K, Lidén C. Nickel on the Swedish market: follow-up 10 years after entry into force of the EU Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:333-339.
Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: a clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:227-241.
Prolonged contact with the skin - definition building for nickel. Definition of “prolonged contact with the skin” in relation to nickel restriction (Entry 27 of Annex XVII to REACH). Eur Chem Agency. 2014;797:1-16.
Erfani B, Lidén C, Midander K. Short and frequent skin contact with nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:222-230.
Midander K, Hurtig A, Borg Tornberg A, Julander A. Allergy risks with laptop computers - nickel and cobalt release. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74:353-359.
Bordel-Gomez MT, Miranda-Romero A. Palladium allergy: a frequent sensitisation. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2008;36:306-307.
Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Özkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46:17-23.
Larese Filon F, Uderzo D, Bagnato E. Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation. Am J Contact Dermat. 2003;14:78-81.
Kränke B, Aberer W. Multiple sensitivities to metals. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:225.
Vincenzi C, Tosti A, Guerra L, et al. Contact Dermatis to Palladium: a study of 2,300 patients. Am J Contact Dermat. 1995;6:110-112.
Durosaro O, el-Azhary RA. A 10-year retrospective study on palladium sensitivity. Dermatitis. 2009;20:208-213.
Muris J, Goossens A, Gonçalo M, et al. Sensitization to palladium in Europe. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:11-19.
Oädlalegeringar för metallkeramik: basmetallegeringar. Kunskapscenter för Dentalamaterial, Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare; 2007.
Rosholm Comstedt L, Engfeldt M, Svedman C, Akesson A, Hindsen M, Bruze M. Variation and covariation in patch test reactivity to palladium and nickel salts. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28:668-676.
Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat. 1999;10:62-67.
Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Uter W, Johansen JD. Immunological, chemical and clinical aspects of exposure to mixtures of contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:133-142.

Auteurs

Jakob Dahlin (J)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Magnus Bruze (M)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Anna Åkesson (A)

Clinical Studies Sweden - Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Monica Hindsén (M)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Ann Pontén (A)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Marléne Isaksson (M)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Cecilia Svedman (C)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH