Using Robust Optimization for Skin Flashing in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: A Feasibility Study.
Algorithms
Breast
/ diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Movement
/ physiology
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Patient Positioning
Radiation Injuries
/ etiology
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ adverse effects
Respiration
Skin
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Journal
Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
15
03
2019
revised:
21
08
2019
accepted:
24
09
2019
pubmed:
19
10
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
19
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study the feasibility and the effectiveness of a novel implementation of robust optimization on 2 sets of computed tomography (CT) data simultaneously for skin flashing in intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer. Five patients who received treatment to the breast and regional lymphatics were selected for this study. For each patient, 3 plans were generated using 3 different skin-flashing methods, including (1) a manual flash plan with optimization on the nominal planning target volume (PTV) not extending beyond the skin that required manually postplanning the opening of the multi-leaf collimator and jaw to obtain flash; (2) an expanded PTV plan with optimization on an expanded PTV that included the target in the air beyond the skin; and (3) a robust-optimized (RO) plan using robust optimization that simultaneously optimizes on the nominal CT data set and a simulated geometry error CT data set. The feasibility and the effectiveness of the robust optimization approach was investigated by comparing it with the 2 other methods. The robustness of the plan against target position variations was studied by simulating 0-, 5-, 10-, and 15-mm geometry errors. The RO plans were the only ones able to meet acceptable criteria for all patients in both the nominal and simulated geometry error scenarios. The expanded PTV plans developed major deviation on the maximum dose to the PTV for 1 patient. For the manual flash plans, every patient developed major deviation either on 95% of the dose to the PTV or the maximum dose to the PTV in the simulated geometry error scenarios. The RO plan demonstrated the best robustness against the target position variation among the 3 methods of skin flashing. The doses to the lung and heart were comparable for all 3 planning techniques. Using robust optimization for skin flash in breast intensity modulated radiation therapy planning is feasible. Further investigation is warranted to confirm the clinical effectiveness of this novel approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31627030
pii: S1879-8500(19)30307-8
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.09.017
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
59-69Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.