A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II, randomized study of lovastatin therapy in the treatment of mildly active rheumatoid arthritis.
Adult
Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies
/ immunology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
C-Reactive Protein
/ immunology
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Lovastatin
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Rheumatoid Factor
/ immunology
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
C-reactive protein
disease activity
inflammation
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
26
05
2019
revised:
19
08
2019
pubmed:
20
10
2019
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
20
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG Co-A) reductase inhibitors (statins) are standard treatment for hyperlipidaemia. In addition to lipid-lowering abilities, statins exhibit multiple anti-inflammatory effects. The objectives of this study were to determine whether treatment of patients with RA with lovastatin decreased CRP or reduced disease activity. We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 12 week trial of lovastatin vs placebo in 64 RA patients with mild clinical disease activity but an elevated CRP. The primary efficacy end point was the reduction in mean log CRP. Secondary end points included disease activity, RF and anti-CCP antibody titres. Mechanistic end points included levels of serum cytokines. Safety was assessed; hepatic and muscle toxicities were of particular interest. Baseline features were similar between groups. No significant difference in mean log CRP reduction between the two groups was observed, and disease activity did not change from baseline in either treatment group. Mechanistic analyses did not reveal significant changes in any biomarkers. A post hoc analysis of subjects not using biologic therapy demonstrated a significantly greater proportion achieving ⩾20% reduction in CRP from baseline in the lovastatin group compared with placebo (P-value = 0.007). No difference was observed in subjects receiving biologics. Lovastatin was well tolerated with no serious safety concerns. This study showed no anti-inflammatory or clinical effects on RA disease activity after 12 weeks of treatment with lovastatin. Lovastatin had a modest effect on CRP in subjects not using biologics, suggesting statins may be anti-inflammatory in selected patients. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00302952.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31628482
pii: 5598423
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez471
pmc: PMC7310095
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies
0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Rheumatoid Factor
9009-79-4
Lovastatin
9LHU78OQFD
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00302952']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1505-1513Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI110494
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM2 AI117870
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jun;38(6):727-35
pubmed: 7779114
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Dec;64(12):1794-803
pubmed: 22736476
J Immunol. 2000 Sep 1;165(5):2712-8
pubmed: 10946302
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jun;46(6):1554-62
pubmed: 12115186
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001 Aug;21(8):1327-32
pubmed: 11498461
Autoimmune Dis. 2013;2013:326258
pubmed: 23840942
J Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;38(2):229-35
pubmed: 21041278
Scand J Rheumatol. 2011 Nov;40(6):411-21
pubmed: 21867445
Leukemia. 2002 Jul;16(7):1362-71
pubmed: 12094262
PLoS Med. 2010 Sep 21;7(9):e1000341
pubmed: 20877716
Br J Pharmacol. 2002 May;136(1):143-9
pubmed: 11976279
Electron Physician. 2016 Aug 25;8(8):2700-2706
pubmed: 27757177
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1315-20
pubmed: 26245753
J Immunol. 1992 Jun 15;148(12):3873-8
pubmed: 1376343
Mod Rheumatol. 2007;17(5):364-8
pubmed: 17929126
Lupus. 2003;12(8):607-11
pubmed: 12945719
Scott Med J. 2012 May;57(2):80-3
pubmed: 22555227
J Lipid Res. 2011 May;52(5):1023-32
pubmed: 21368320
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 May;29(3):277-284
pubmed: 28207495
Circulation. 2002 Sep 10;106(11):e47; author reply e47
pubmed: 12221065
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1459-64
pubmed: 17552046
Lab Invest. 2000 Jul;80(7):1095-100
pubmed: 10908155
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):124-31
pubmed: 23482473
Nat Med. 2001 Jun;7(6):687-92
pubmed: 11385505
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):1959-65
pubmed: 11430324
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):OC32-6
pubmed: 27437268
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8
pubmed: 7818570
Atherosclerosis. 2000 Sep;152(1):217-27
pubmed: 10996358
Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2015-21
pubmed: 15207950
Swiss Med Wkly. 2001 Jan 27;131(3-4):41-6
pubmed: 11219190
JAMA. 1998 May 27;279(20):1615-22
pubmed: 9613910