Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds.
REDD+
biodiversity
climate change
equity
trade-offs
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 11 2019
05 11 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
23
10
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
23
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31636201
pii: 1908683116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908683116
pmc: PMC6842634
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22645-22650Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):144-7
pubmed: 27362236
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 20;109(12):4696-701
pubmed: 22392996
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855
pubmed: 25592418
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9808-9813
pubmed: 31010922
Bioscience. 2019 Mar 1;69(3):191-197
pubmed: 30914829
Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):218-27
pubmed: 22443128
Science. 2009 Dec 4;326(5958):1368
pubmed: 19965752
Ecol Lett. 2018 Mar;21(3):365-375
pubmed: 29314473
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 11;112(32):E4342
pubmed: 26240326
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):419-22
pubmed: 19628857
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):6229-34
pubmed: 23530207
Nature. 2012 Jun 06;486(7401):68-73
pubmed: 22678281
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):294-303
pubmed: 28861904
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10302-7
pubmed: 18650377
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190748
pubmed: 29293650
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):3563-6
pubmed: 26976572
Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):337-40
pubmed: 16541073