Excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mid-term follow up.
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Germany
/ epidemiology
Hamstring Tendons
/ surgery
Humans
Incidence
Leg Injuries
/ physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prognosis
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Return to Sport
Rupture
Tendon Injuries
/ physiopathology
Avulsion
Clinical outcome
Complication
Injury
Proximal hamstring tendons
Repair
Return to sports
Tear
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
18
08
2019
accepted:
09
10
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
27
10
2020
entrez:
26
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proximal hamstring tendon avulsions lead to a significant loss of strength and a functional deficit of the respective lower limb and surgery is the recommended treatment. Only little is known about the clinical outcomes and complications when comparing acute and chronic management as well as partial and complete tears. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical results and the complication rate of patients after surgical treatment of proximal hamstring tendon injuries. It was hypothesized that surgical treatment of an acute proximal hamstring avulsion would lead to a superior clinical outcome with a low complication rate and high return to sports rate compared to chronic cases and partial avulsions. Patients who underwent proximal hamstring tendon repair between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Outcome measurements were obtained by means of Lysholm score, Harris Hip Score, Visual Analog Scale, and Tegner Activity Scale. Return to sports (RTS) rate was determined. Postoperative adverse events were recorded and complications reported. Patients' outcomes were compared between acute/chronic repair and partial/complete injury patterns. Ninety-four of 120 (78.3%) were available for final assessment at a mean follow-up of 56.2 ± 27.2 months. Clinical outcome measures were excellent and did not differ between the treatment groups or between the different injury patterns. RTS was achieved by 86.2% of the patients and was significantly superior after acute treatment (p < 0.05). The overall complication rate was 8.5% and significantly higher in complete tears compared to partial tears and in delay compared to acute surgery (p < 0.05). Surgical treatment of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions results in excellent clinical outcome scores and a high RTS rate. Open surgical treatment has shown to be a safe procedure with a low complication rate. Surgical timing is important, as early surgical intervention provides a higher RTS rate and a lower complication rate than delayed surgery and should therefore be preferred in clinical practice. Repair of partial and complete tears lead to similar clinical outcome, but a higher complication rate in complete avulsions. Level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31650312
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05748-0
pii: 10.1007/s00167-019-05748-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1230-1235Références
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):515-33
pubmed: 23229384
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;28(4):574-6
pubmed: 10921653
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2933-47
pubmed: 23703914
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2365-74
pubmed: 18978405
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Dec;119(12):1031-1042
pubmed: 27896364
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jun;12(2):138-146
pubmed: 30806898
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 5;93(19):1819-26
pubmed: 22005868
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;40(8):688-91
pubmed: 16790482
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2325-30
pubmed: 22869623
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Feb 15;7(2):2325967118823712
pubmed: 30800686
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):393-9
pubmed: 10658712
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):385-91
pubmed: 25404617
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2798-2808
pubmed: 29016194
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 17;5(11):2325967117738551
pubmed: 29201925
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 24;7(6):2325967119853218
pubmed: 31259189
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;37(7):e8
pubmed: 27337429
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):673-684
pubmed: 30374579
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1110-5
pubmed: 18319349
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2577-84
pubmed: 23989349
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1221-1229
pubmed: 31541291
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2017 Sep;31(3):160-166
pubmed: 28869997
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Jul;13(5):411-8
pubmed: 15602681
Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Oct;32(10):582-9
pubmed: 12942206
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2449-2456
pubmed: 24556933
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;47(6):342-50
pubmed: 23080315
Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Nov 15;:
pubmed: 30444732
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2841-51
pubmed: 25384502
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1363-71
pubmed: 23576684
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1377-83
pubmed: 24699851
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):2130-5
pubmed: 24420604
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2092-8
pubmed: 22904210
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Feb 23;5(2):2325967117692507
pubmed: 28321428
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1943-1950
pubmed: 28280908
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3121-3124
pubmed: 29725745