A case report on crossed aphasia in dextrals: Consideration about clinical features and neural network.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
10
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
7
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The term crossed aphasia in dextrals (CAD) describes aphasia following a right hemisphere lesion in right-handed subjects. The diagnostic criteria for CAD, defined on the basis of clinical cases observed over the years, are aphasia; lesion in right hemisphere; strong preference for right hand use without familial history of left handedness; structural integrity of left hemisphere; and absence of brain damage in childhood. The studies of CAD have mainly been focused on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the functional neurocognitive lateralization and organization of the brain, such as a dissociation between language and handedness, language and praxis, or other cognitive functions.Patient concerns: We described a case of a patient affected by an aphasic syndrome following cerebral hemorrhage located in right hemisphere. Considering the correlation between clinical data and instrumental investigations such as magnetic resonance imaging, we diagnose the patient with non-fluent aphasia. Specifically, the patient came to our attention showing a trans-cortical mixed aphasia that, later, developed in a trans-cortical motor aphasia. Contrary to most cases of CAD, our patient does not show apraxia and visuo-spatial neglect. Interventions language and visual attention when latter functions are related to right hemisphere. The rehabilitation program consisted in exercises stimulating verbal fluency, comprehension, reading, and writing. After 5 months of rehabilitation patient showed significant improvement in comprehension and absence of echolalia. At present there is no agreement about pathogenesis of CAD and neural mechanism is still unclear. Considering the clinical symptomatology, we can argue that we observed a non-fluent aphasia. However, a more large sample should be studied to asses the role of brain circuits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31651891
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017660
pii: 00005792-201910250-00059
pmc: PMC6824653
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17660Références
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;23(10):e477-e478
pubmed: 25284718
Behav Neurol. 2008;19(4):177-94
pubmed: 19096142
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Oct;28(10):1529-33
pubmed: 24133361
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:27-37
pubmed: 24368886
Cortex. 1985 Mar;21(1):81-90
pubmed: 3987313
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Dec;35(6):949-53
pubmed: 22506227
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2017 Jan;85(1):34-42
pubmed: 28114692
Cortex. 2004 Feb;40(1):41-74
pubmed: 15070002
Brain Lang. 1981 Sep;14(1):190-202
pubmed: 6168326
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Dec;52(6):782-790
pubmed: 27098299
Brain. 1989 Aug;112 ( Pt 4):953-73
pubmed: 2673485
Brain Lang. 1996 Nov;55(2):213-39
pubmed: 8939302
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(5):400-6
pubmed: 16205059
Brain Lang. 2002 Dec;83(3):425-63
pubmed: 12468397
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;47:48-60
pubmed: 28807138
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 May;51(2):172-6
pubmed: 3702365
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2188-2201.e8
pubmed: 27063364